--- description: Detaillierte Informationen über Grant Lifecycle Manager zu Benutzerfreundlichkeit, Funktionen, Kosten, Vor- und Nachteilen aus verifizierten Nutzer-Erfahrungen. Lies Ratings & Bewertungen und entdecke ähnliche Tools dank Capterra Austria. image: https://gdm-localsites-assets-gfprod.imgix.net/images/capterra/og_logo-e5a8c001ed0bd1bb922639230fcea71a.png?auto=format%2Cenhance%2Ccompress title: Grant Lifecycle Manager Kosten, Erfahrungen & Bewertungen - Capterra Österreich 2026 --- Breadcrumb: [Startseite](/) > [Fördermittelverwaltung Software](/directory/30567/grant-management/software) > [Grant Lifecycle Manager](/software/122147/grant-lifecycle-manager) # Grant Lifecycle Manager Canonical: https://www.capterra.at/software/122147/grant-lifecycle-manager Seite: 1 / 3\ Zurück: [Nächste Seite](https://www.capterra.at/software/122147/grant-lifecycle-manager?page=2) > Foundant GLM ist eine leistungsstarke Online-Spendenlösung mit einer intuitiven Plattform, die den Erfolg des Kunden in den Mittelpunkt stellt. > > Bewertung: **4.9/5** von 52 Nutzern. Top bewertet für **Weiterempfehlungsquote**. ----- ## Übersicht ### Wer verwendet Grant Lifecycle Manager? Foundant für Geldgeber wurde für geldgebende Unternehmen entwickelt, die ihren Geldgebungsprozess vom Anfang bis zum Ende effizient gestalten und effektiv Daten verwalten wollen. ## Kurzstatistiken und Ratings | Metrik | Bewertung | Detail | | **Gesamt** | **4.9/5** | 52 Nutzerbewertungen | | Bedienkomfort | 4.6/5 | Auf Basis der Gesamtbewertungen | | Kundenbetreuung | 4.9/5 | Auf Basis der Gesamtbewertungen | | Preis-Leistungs-Verhältnis | 4.9/5 | Auf Basis der Gesamtbewertungen | | Funktionen | 4.6/5 | Auf Basis der Gesamtbewertungen | | Empfehlungsprozentsatz | 90% | (9/10 Weiterempfehlungsquote) | ## Über den Anbieter - **Unternehmen**: Foundant - **Region**: Bozeman, USA - **Gegründet**: 2006 ## Gewerblicher Kontext - **Startpreis**: $ 9 900,00 - **Zielgruppe**: Selbstständig, 2–10, 11–50, 51–200, 201–500, 501–1 000, 1 001–5 000, 5 001–10 000, 10 000+ - **Bereitstellungen und Plattformen**: Cloud, SaaS, webbasiert - **Unterstützte Sprachen**: Englisch - **Verfügbare Länder**: Kanada, Vereinigte Staaten, Vereinigtes Königreich ## Funktionen - Berichterstattung und Statistik - Dokumentenprüfung - Erinnerungen - Formularverwaltung - Werkzeuge zur Zusammenarbeit - Zahlung-Nachverfolgung ## Integrationen (1 insgesamt) - Microsoft Word ## Optionen für Kundensupport - E-Mail/Helpdesk - FAQ/Forum - Wissensdatenbank - Telefon-Support - Chat ## Category - [Fördermittelverwaltung Software](https://www.capterra.at/directory/30567/grant-management/software) ## Alternativen 1. [Fluxx Grantmaker](https://www.capterra.at/software/146625/fluxx-software-for-grantmakers) — 4.3/5 (95 reviews) 2. [Submittable](https://www.capterra.at/software/158382/submittable) — 4.8/5 (398 reviews) 3. [MonkeyPod](https://www.capterra.at/software/203848/monkeypod) — 4.8/5 (101 reviews) 4. [Sage Intacct](https://www.capterra.at/software/76/intacct) — 4.3/5 (684 reviews) 5. [Little Green Light](https://www.capterra.at/software/123954/little-green-light) — 4.8/5 (316 reviews) ## Nutzerbewertungen ### "Foundant provides a simple grant management interface" — 5.0/5 > **Verifizierter Rezensent** | *7. März 2018* | Philanthropie | Empfehlungsbewertung: 8.0/10 > > **Vorteile**: Foundant for Grantmakers is easy to navigate and use. It is also very clean and naturalistic. The level of functionality is also impressive. Reporting tools are easy. Proposals can be easily reviewed and scored using the interface. > > **Nachteile**: High volume foundations or community foundations may struggle with the ability to process all their grants. > > Foundant for Grantmakers allows the streamlining of processes. From proposal to grant, Foundant for Grantmakers simplifies the process in an orderly way. ----- ### "Operations Manager" — 5.0/5 > **Joan** | *4. Oktober 2023* | Non-Profit-Organisation Management | Empfehlungsbewertung: 9.0/10 > > **Vorteile**: Flexibility/adaptability. Completeness of the grant making process. Fits well with integration of systems for our organization. > > **Nachteile**: It's starting to feel like you need to be a techy to use some features, especially reporting. > > Great historical record of grants. Applicants like the system. Overall, we are satisfied with GLM. Appreciate the online training sessions. ----- ### "Very user-friendly and easy to compile reports" — 5.0/5 > **Kanitra** | *22. Mai 2018* | Empfehlungsbewertung: 4.0/10 > > **Vorteile**: Access to reports, organization information, follow up information at the click of a button - literally. I also appreciate that it is connected to GuideStar\! > > **Nachteile**: Application process - to complete/approve applications is a little tricky. I am only a year into utilizing the software for reporting. Being that applicants have been approved and I listed them under approved, I am still not so sure why they are showing up as complete or in the same spot... I still have some learning to do. ----- ### "Great Product for Managing Grants" — 5.0/5 > **Beth** | *19. Dezember 2018* | Non-Profit-Organisation Management | Empfehlungsbewertung: 10.0/10 > > **Vorteile**: The pricing of this software compared to others is very reasonable, especially for a small nonprofit where cost is crucial. I would recommend that you already have your grant-making process pretty organized before starting to work with the system - though signing up and getting everything in the system definitely forced us to work everything out as far as process goes, which was helpful. The support that we received from our account manager as well as support staff via chat was extremely helpful, I used the chat almost daily in the beginning\! The chat feature is really great because you rarely have to wait for assistance. We really love the reporting and customization options, especially being able to set up automatic emails for when reports are due, past due, assigned, etc. This system has helped us collect consistent data across various projects, which makes reporting much easier. There are a ton of reporting options available, though we have yet to use a lot of that section. Also love that we can have multiple people reviewing and giving feedback on applications. They are always making updates which are useful, I recommend reading the update highlights when they come out, I always learn something new\! Overall this is a wonderful product that has exponentially improved our grant-making and management. > > **Nachteile**: It did take us a little while to figure out how best to use the software, but I think this was because we also had to set up our processes. After a month or so of using it we were pretty comfortable. The only issue we run into is when we accept applications from organizations as well as individuals, because the system is really only designed for organizations to apply. We were able to work around it, but it would be nice if the system was designed to include both types already. We also have had a few issues with duplicate organizations being created, despite setting up a warning message to users, but deleting the duplicates are easy enough. It would also be helpful to be able to move grants between processes, right now you have to delete the entire application and re-enter it manually in another process. But overall, the pros far outweigh the cons. > > Using Foundant has organized our grant-making process substantially. We are able to ensure accurate and up to date reporting and collect consistent and useful data. Setting up automation for reporting has taken a lot of work off our hands, and made everything much easier. It also allows us to have all important information and documents related to specific grants stored in the same place, which is easy for all users to access. Overall a really great product. ----- ### "We Love Foundant\!" — 5.0/5 > **Cate** | *4. Oktober 2023* | Non-Profit-Organisation Management | Empfehlungsbewertung: 10.0/10 > > **Vorteile**: The ease of use for both us in the office and our grant partners. We love the customizable forms that has made our move to a more trust-based grant making seamless. The system is easy to move around in and we can always find what we're looking for. > > **Nachteile**: It would be nice to have the ability to tag certain organizations that we've added comments to. For example, an organization that we've added a comment to that will be important for us, or those who come behind us, to see. > > Love it\! ----- Seite: 1 / 3\ Zurück: [Nächste Seite](https://www.capterra.at/software/122147/grant-lifecycle-manager?page=2) ## Links - [Auf Capterra anzeigen](https://www.capterra.at/software/122147/grant-lifecycle-manager) ## Diese Seite ist in den folgenden Sprachen verfügbar | Sprache | URL | | de | | | de-AT | | | de-CH | | | en | | | en-AE | | | en-AU | | | en-CA | | | en-GB | | | en-IE | | | en-IL | | | en-IN | | | en-NZ | | | en-SG | | | en-ZA | | | es | | | es-AR | | | es-CL | | | es-CO | | | es-CR | | | es-DO | | | es-EC | | | es-MX | | | es-PA | | | es-PE | | | fr | | | fr-BE | | | fr-CA | | | fr-LU | | | it | | | nl | | | nl-BE | | | pt | | | pt-PT | | ----- ## Strukturierte Daten