--- description: Detaillierte Informationen über N-central zu Benutzerfreundlichkeit, Funktionen, Kosten, Vor- und Nachteilen aus verifizierten Nutzer-Erfahrungen. Lies Ratings & Bewertungen und entdecke ähnliche Tools dank Capterra Austria. image: https://gdm-localsites-assets-gfprod.imgix.net/images/capterra/og_logo-e5a8c001ed0bd1bb922639230fcea71a.png?auto=format%2Cenhance%2Ccompress title: N-central Kosten, Erfahrungen & Bewertungen - Capterra Österreich 2026 --- Breadcrumb: [Startseite](/) > [IT Asset Management Software](/directory/30077/it-asset-management/software) > [N-central](/software/13803/n-central) # N-central Canonical: https://www.capterra.at/software/13803/n-central Seite: 1 / 11\ Zurück: [Nächste Seite](https://www.capterra.at/software/13803/n-central?page=2) > Die Fernüberwachungs- und Verwaltungsplattform N-able® N-central® ist darauf ausgelegt, die Verwaltung komplexer IT-Netzwerke zu vereinfachen. > > Bewertung: **4.2/5** von 253 Nutzern. Top bewertet für **Weiterempfehlungsquote**. ----- ## Übersicht ### Wer verwendet N-central? Wachsende IT-Dienstleister und Managed Service Provider (MSPs) ## Kurzstatistiken und Ratings | Metrik | Bewertung | Detail | | **Gesamt** | **4.2/5** | 253 Nutzerbewertungen | | Bedienkomfort | 4.0/5 | Auf Basis der Gesamtbewertungen | | Kundenbetreuung | 3.9/5 | Auf Basis der Gesamtbewertungen | | Preis-Leistungs-Verhältnis | 3.9/5 | Auf Basis der Gesamtbewertungen | | Funktionen | 4.2/5 | Auf Basis der Gesamtbewertungen | | Empfehlungsprozentsatz | 70% | (7/10 Weiterempfehlungsquote) | ## Über den Anbieter - **Unternehmen**: N-able ## Gewerblicher Kontext - **Startpreis**: $ 1,75 - **Preismodell**: (Gratis Testen) - **Zielgruppe**: 2–10, 11–50, 51–200, 201–500, 501–1 000, 1 001–5 000, 5 001–10 000, 10 000+ - **Bereitstellungen und Plattformen**: Cloud, SaaS, webbasiert, Mac (Desktop), Windows (Desktop), Linux (Desktop), Windows (On-Premise), Linux (On-Premise), Android (mobil), iPhone (mobil), iPad (mobil) - **Unterstützte Sprachen**: Englisch - **Verfügbare Länder**: Afghanistan, Algerien, Amerikanisch-Samoa, Amerikanische Jungferninseln, Andorra, Angola, Anguilla, Antigua und Barbuda, Argentinien, Armenien, Aruba, Aserbaidschan, Australien, Bahamas, Bahrain, Bangladesch, Barbados, Belgien, Benin, Bermuda und 177 weitere ## Funktionen - Aktivitäts-Dashboard - Aktivitäts-Verfolgung - Alarmfunktion / Benachrichtigungen - Alerts/Escalation - App-Verwaltung - Aufgabenmanagement - Automatische Geräteerkennung - Automatische Patch-Implementierung - Automatische Scans - BYOD-Management - Backup und Recovery - Bandbreiten-Überwachung - Baseline-Manager - Berichterstattung / Analyse - Berichterstattung und Statistik - Compliance Management - Dashboard Software - Echtzeit-Warnungen - Einsatz-Management - Ereignisprotokolle - Für MSPs - Gerätemanagement - IT-Asset-Management - IT-Betriebsmittelverwaltung - IT-Reporting - Inventarverwaltung - Kapazitätsmanagement - Konfigurationsmanagement - Korrektur-Management - Leistungsüberwachung - Management des kompletten Netzwerks - Netzwerkanalyse - Problemmanagement - Real-Time Data - Real-Time Monitoring - Real-Time Notifications - Remote-Monitoring und -Management - Remote-Zugriff/-Kontrolle - Remotezugriff und -monitoring - Richtlinien Managemen- - Sanierungsmanagement - Schwachstellen-Scannen - Self-Service Portal - Simple Network Management Protocol (SNMP) - Supportticket-Management - Verfolgen von Vermögensanlagen - Wartungsplanung - Wirtschaftsprüfung-Management - Zugriffskontrollen / Berechtigungen - Überwachung ... und 18 weitere Funktionen ## Integrationen (37 insgesamt) - 1Password - Acronis Cyber Protect Cloud - Actifile - AlertOps - Automox - Autotask PSA - Auvik - Barracuda Intronis Backup - BrightGauge - Cisco Meraki - CloudBlue - Computicate PSA - ConnectWise PSA - DNSFilter - DeskDay ... und 22 weitere Integrationen ## Optionen für Kundensupport - E-Mail/Helpdesk - FAQ/Forum - Wissensdatenbank - Telefon-Support ## Category - [IT Asset Management Software](https://www.capterra.at/directory/30077/it-asset-management/software) ## Ähnliche Kategorien - [IT Asset Management Software](https://www.capterra.at/directory/30077/it-asset-management/software) - [Netzwerkmanagement-Software](https://www.capterra.at/directory/30018/network-management/software) - [Endpoint Protection Software](https://www.capterra.at/directory/30907/endpoint-protection/software) - [IT-, Server- und Netzwerk Tools](https://www.capterra.at/directory/32713/server-monitoring/software) - [IT-Management-Software](https://www.capterra.at/directory/10001/it-management/software) ## Alternativen 1. [ManageEngine OpManager MSP](https://www.capterra.at/software/212602/manageengine-opmanager-msp) — 4.4/5 (72 reviews) 2. [Atera](https://www.capterra.at/software/144309/atera) — 4.5/5 (448 reviews) 3. [N-sight RMM](https://www.capterra.at/software/163344/n-sight) — 4.3/5 (197 reviews) 4. [IT Glue](https://www.capterra.at/software/170401/itglue) — 4.6/5 (331 reviews) 5. [SuperOps](https://www.capterra.at/software/1017782/superopsai) — 4.6/5 (65 reviews) ## Nutzerbewertungen ### "Best Partner, Product is improving quickly." — 5.0/5 > **Joshua** | *6. Juni 2025* | Computer- & Netzwerksicherheit | Empfehlungsbewertung: 8.0/10 > > **Vorteile**: It's ability to handle 3rd party patches is significant for being a default feature set. They also have built a great first pane of glass experience. > > **Nachteile**: N-Central does not have the ability to automate against the system itself. This has required my team to work around some of the constraints instead of building exactly what they need. > > N-Able's partnership is not to be matched. They're a great partner. When they promise a feature they deliver it and they're hard at work building the most scalable traditional RMM product that will exist in the market. ----- ### "Great RMM and remote tool. MSP Manager great for our internal IT ticketing." — 4.0/5 > **brad** | *28. April 2026* | Internet | Empfehlungsbewertung: 7.0/10 > > **Vorteile**: What stands out most about N-able N-central is how it consolidates monitoring, management, and automation into a single, scalable platform. The unified dashboard gives clear visibility across endpoints, servers, and network devices without needing to jump between tools. Automation policies—especially for patching and remediation—save a significant amount of manual effort and reduce human error. Remote access is fast and reliable, which is critical for day-to-day support. > > **Nachteile**: While N-able N-central is a strong platform overall, performance can be inconsistent at times. Certain actions—like loading dashboards, executing remote tasks, or navigating between views—can feel slower than expected, especially during peak usage. This can impact efficiency when quick responses are needed. Additionally, support responsiveness has been hit-or-miss. While the team is knowledgeable, there are instances where response times lag or follow-ups take longer than ideal, particularly during urgent situations. Improving platform speed consistency and tightening support turnaround times would make a noticeable difference in the overall experience. > > It provides a solid, centralized platform for monitoring, patch management, and remote support, which helps streamline workflows and reduce the need for multiple tools. The automation capabilities are a major advantage, allowing routine maintenance and issue remediation to run with minimal manual intervention. While there are occasional slowdowns and support response times can vary, the system itself is stable and capable at scale. For organizations managing multiple endpoints or clients, it delivers strong value and dependable performance overall. ----- ### "N-Central / N-Able Review" — 3.0/5 > **Christian** | *28. April 2026* | Informationstechnologie & -dienste | Empfehlungsbewertung: 3.0/10 > > **Vorteile**: The alerting system is highly reliable, ensuring that critical issues are flagged immediately without constant noise. Deployment of the agent is generally straightforward across various environments, which saves a significant amount of time during onboarding. Additionally, the patch management engine does a solid job of keeping third-party software and OS versions up to date, providing a dependable baseline for security and system stability across our managed endpoints. > > **Nachteile**: 1. General Technical Support The support experience has become increasingly frustrating, often feeling like a hurdle rather than a resource. Response times are inconsistent, and there is a noticeable lack of deep technical expertise during initial contact, leading to prolonged downtimes for critical issues. 2. Adlumin Support Support for the Adlumin integration is particularly poor, often resulting in a "finger-pointing" loop where no one takes responsibility. It is difficult to get a straight answer or a specialist who actually understands the nuances of the integration. 3. Lack of Issue Ownership There is a glaring lack of accountability when it comes to taking ownership of open issues. Tickets frequently sit in limbo or are passed between departments without a primary point of contact ensuring the problem is actually resolved to completion. 4. Difficulty with Escalations The escalation process is opaque and incredibly slow. Even when a ticket is clearly beyond the scope of Tier 1, getting it moved to a senior engineer feels like an uphill battle, causing simple technical roadblocks to turn into multi-day ordeals. 5. Automation Policy Limitations (No PowerShell) The inability to natively use PowerShell within automation policies is a major step backward for modern IT environments. Forcing us to use a restrictive, proprietary builder instead of industry-standard scripting severely limits our ability to automate complex tasks. 6. Search Query Regressions A recent update broke the search functionality so that it no longer auto-updates the query results as you type or change parameters. This small but vital UI regression adds unnecessary clicks and friction to what should be a basic, streamlined workflow. 7. Poor Reporting Features The reporting engine is severely lacking and feels outdated. The formatting is strange and unprofessional, making it difficult to hand these documents directly to clients without extensive manual editing or external tools to make the data digestible. 8. Misplaced AI Focus The aggressive push for AI feels like a distraction from core platform stability. Instead of developing AI to solve "non-issues," the development team needs to prioritize fixing the long-standing bugs and workflow limitations that partners deal with every single day. > > The overall experience with N-able is a study in frustration between a solid, functional core and a deteriorating support and development ecosystem. On a technical level, the platform delivers on its primary promises: the alerting is dependable, and the agent deployment and patch management provide a reliable foundation for basic endpoint maintenance. When the "lights are on," the software does exactly what it needs to do to keep a fleet stable. However, the experience begins to sour as soon as you attempt to scale into advanced automation or require vendor assistance. The restriction against native PowerShell in automation policies is a massive hurdle for any modern, script-heavy MSP workflow, forcing a reliance on clunky, proprietary tools. These technical "paper cuts"—like the regressive search UI and lackluster reporting—are compounded by a support structure that seems to lack accountability and a clear escalation path, especially regarding integrations like Adlumin. Ultimately, using N-able feels like driving a reliable car where the manufacturer has stopped listening to the drivers. While the "engine" (patching and alerts) is strong, the "dashboard" (UI/Reports) is dated, and the "service center" (Support) is unresponsive. The recent pivot toward AI features feels like a missed mark; the platform would be far more valuable if the developers focused on refining existing workflows and fixing long-standing bugs rather than chasing industry buzzwords. It remains a "good enough" tool for basic needs, but it is becoming increasingly difficult to justify for high-level automation and complex support requirements. ----- ### "N-central was easy to quickly setup and deploy for our company" — 4.0/5 > **Bill** | *28. April 2026* | Informationstechnologie & -dienste | Empfehlungsbewertung: 8.0/10 > > **Vorteile**: We liked the user interface and management processes the most about deploying n-central. The user interface is very streamlined and helps greatly for navigation between clients. > > **Nachteile**: The only downside we've had at this time is sometimes getting customer support on the phone, we'd really like it if it were a more consistent experience about who speak with on the phone when issues come up. > > Our overall experience with N-central has been very good and we'd recommend it to others companies similar to our who are looking for alternatives to Kaseya and Connectwise like we were when we started looking for a new RMM partner. ----- ### "Reliable and Powerful RMM Platform for MSP Growth" — 5.0/5 > **Sean** | *11. Mai 2026* | Computer- & Netzwerksicherheit | Empfehlungsbewertung: 9.0/10 > > **Vorteile**: N-central provides excellent visibility and centralized management across all client environments. The automation capabilities, device monitoring, patch management, and remote access tools significantly reduce administrative overhead, improve response times, and deliver a strong ROI by saving both time and operational costs. Its flexibility and scalability make it ideal for managing both small and large customer environments, and their customer support team is knowledgeable, responsive, and helpful when resolving issues or optimizing platform performance. > > **Nachteile**: The initial setup and learning curve can be challenging, especially for new administrators. Some advanced configurations and policy tuning require deeper product knowledge, and the interface can occasionally feel cluttered when navigating complex environments. > > Overall, my experience with N-central has been very positive. It has become a core platform in our managed services operations, allowing us to streamline endpoint management, automate repetitive tasks, improve patch compliance, and proactively monitor client systems. Its robust feature set and reliable performance have helped us deliver better service and support to our customers. ----- Seite: 1 / 11\ Zurück: [Nächste Seite](https://www.capterra.at/software/13803/n-central?page=2) ## Links - [Auf Capterra anzeigen](https://www.capterra.at/software/13803/n-central) ## Diese Seite ist in den folgenden Sprachen verfügbar | Sprache | URL | | de | | | de-AT | | | de-CH | | | en | | | en-AE | | | en-AU | | | en-CA | | | en-GB | | | en-IE | | | en-IL | | | en-IN | | | en-NZ | | | en-SG | | | en-ZA | | | es | | | es-AR | | | es-CL | | | es-CO | | | es-CR | | | es-DO | | | es-EC | | | es-MX | | | es-PA | | | es-PE | | | fr | | | fr-BE | | | fr-CA | | | fr-LU | | | it | | | nl | | | nl-BE | | | pt | | | pt-PT | | | sv | | ----- ## Strukturierte Daten