--- description: Detaillierte Informationen über Fluxx Grantmaker zu Benutzerfreundlichkeit, Funktionen, Kosten, Vor- und Nachteilen aus verifizierten Nutzer-Erfahrungen. Lies Ratings & Bewertungen und entdecke ähnliche Tools dank Capterra Austria. image: https://gdm-localsites-assets-gfprod.imgix.net/images/capterra/og_logo-e5a8c001ed0bd1bb922639230fcea71a.png?auto=format%2Cenhance%2Ccompress title: Fluxx Grantmaker Kosten, Erfahrungen & Bewertungen - Capterra Österreich 2026 --- Breadcrumb: [Startseite](/) > [Fördermittelverwaltung Software](/directory/30567/grant-management/software) > [Fluxx Grantmaker](/software/146625/fluxx-software-for-grantmakers) # Fluxx Grantmaker Canonical: https://www.capterra.at/software/146625/fluxx-software-for-grantmakers Seite: 1 / 5\ Zurück: [Nächste Seite](https://www.capterra.at/software/146625/fluxx-software-for-grantmakers?page=2) > Fluxx Grantmaker vereinfacht die Arbeit und die Berichterstattung über Auswirkungen. Fordere eine Demo an. > > Bewertung: **4.3/5** von 94 Nutzern. Top bewertet für **Weiterempfehlungsquote**. ----- ## Übersicht ### Wer verwendet Fluxx Grantmaker? Führende Software für die Fördermittelvermittlung, die sich für Organisationen eignet, die mehrere Programme verwalten und jährlich mehrere Zuschüsse vergeben, die Effizienz fördern und ihrer Kundschaft eine gute Erfahrung bieten möchten. ## Kurzstatistiken und Ratings | Metrik | Bewertung | Detail | | **Gesamt** | **4.3/5** | 94 Nutzerbewertungen | | Bedienkomfort | 3.9/5 | Auf Basis der Gesamtbewertungen | | Kundenbetreuung | 4.0/5 | Auf Basis der Gesamtbewertungen | | Preis-Leistungs-Verhältnis | 4.1/5 | Auf Basis der Gesamtbewertungen | | Funktionen | 4.2/5 | Auf Basis der Gesamtbewertungen | | Empfehlungsprozentsatz | 80% | (8/10 Weiterempfehlungsquote) | ## Über den Anbieter - **Unternehmen**: Fluxx - **Region**: San Francisco, USA - **Gegründet**: 2010 ## Gewerblicher Kontext - **Zielgruppe**: 2–10, 11–50, 51–200, 201–500, 501–1 000, 1 001–5 000, 5 001–10 000, 10 000+ - **Bereitstellungen und Plattformen**: Cloud, SaaS, webbasiert, Mac (Desktop), Windows (Desktop), Android (mobil), iPhone (mobil), iPad (mobil) - **Unterstützte Sprachen**: Englisch - **Verfügbare Länder**: Australien, Deutschland, Frankreich, Irland, Kanada, Neuseeland, Niederlande, Singapur, Südafrika, Vereinigte Staaten, Vereinigtes Königreich ## Funktionen - Berichterstattung und Statistik - Buchhaltung - CRM-Systeme - Dokumentenprüfung - Erinnerungen - Finanzberichterstattung - Formularverwaltung - Förderungssuche - Kommunikationsmanagement - Mitglieder-Datenbank - Vertrags-/Lizenz-Management - Werkzeuge zur Zusammenarbeit - Zahlung-Nachverfolgung ## Integrationen (18 insgesamt) - Docusign - Google Contacts - Google Docs - Google Drive - Google Maps - GuideSTAR - Mailchimp - Microsoft 365 - Microsoft Excel - Microsoft Outlook - Microsoft Word - NetSuite - QuickBooks Online - QuickBooks Online Advanced - Sage Intacct ... und 3 weitere Integrationen ## Optionen für Kundensupport - E-Mail/Helpdesk - FAQ/Forum - Wissensdatenbank - Telefon-Support - Chat ## Category - [Fördermittelverwaltung Software](https://www.capterra.at/directory/30567/grant-management/software) ## Ähnliche Kategorien - [Fördermittelverwaltung Software](https://www.capterra.at/directory/30567/grant-management/software) - [NPO Software (Non-Profit-Organisationen)](https://www.capterra.at/directory/30805/nonprofit/software) ## Alternativen 1. [Good Grants](https://www.capterra.at/software/206672/good-grants) — 4.8/5 (21 reviews) 2. [Submittable](https://www.capterra.at/software/158382/submittable) — 4.8/5 (398 reviews) 3. [MonkeyPod](https://www.capterra.at/software/203848/monkeypod) — 4.8/5 (100 reviews) 4. [Sage Intacct](https://www.capterra.at/software/76/intacct) — 4.3/5 (608 reviews) 5. [Grant Lifecycle Manager](https://www.capterra.at/software/122147/grant-lifecycle-manager) — 4.9/5 (51 reviews) ## Nutzerbewertungen ### "Super Flexible Grantmaking System" — 4.0/5 > **Stephen** | *5. Mai 2022* | Philanthropie | Empfehlungsbewertung: 10.0/10 > > **Vorteile**: The positive experience started from the beginning: the onboarding process. The onboarding team helped guide us through organising all the exported data from our old system and mapping it into the new structure. I learned that there is no "default" setup - everything was set up from scratch to match our desired workflow and existing data. As we have grown and needed to make changes to our grants programmes, we have customised Fluxx more and more to our particular needs. The majority of this we have been able to do ourselves or with the help of the active and helpful Fluxx community from around the world. There is a huge amount of knowledge and goodwill on the Fluxx community forum, there are local user groups, and an annual Fluxxcon conference. The Fluxx community is well supported by the company (dedicated member of staff) and by far the quickest way to get help when needed. Fluxx's Advanced Services team are available to take on bigger customisation projects, but we have not needed to use them (yet). Another stand-out for me about the product is that you can modify the system using (limited) lower-level coding in a reporting language called Liquid HTML, and its underlying language Ruby. This opens up possibilities for incredible customisation of reporting, workflow, external data access, and processing. > > **Nachteile**: From the beginning I realised "there is no manual". Yes, there is documentation within the help-desk system and this is growing over time, but it tends to be task-based rather than actually describing the interface and what everything does. Support is sketchy at times. There is often better information and help from the rest of the global community than from the Helpdesk; over time, too many of my bug reports have gotten stuck at "With Engineering" and not resolved. Offsetting the support issues is the way that Fluxx provides levels of certification for users and admins, though online courses. These appear to be valuable conduits for product knowledge and good practice. Recently, Fluxx has locked down some of the things that we used to be allowed to do with Ruby programming within the system. Thankfully, they listened to users' voices and have allowed some more flexibility than they were planning, but the net effect has been that it takes some more time and effort to learn the programming environment and to implement features using it. The cost is quite considerable, about 1.5% of our granting budget. This could be prohibitive for grant-makers smaller than we are. We feel we get good value for this. > > We have been able to streamline our operations considerably with Fluxx, so that our standard workflow can be operated by one person, and the quality of the generated reports taken to our Board is exceptional. The flexibility is so great that it can be a challenge to know when to stop refining processes\! Having got to this stage, however, it means we can concentrate more on higher-level concerns like outcome reporting, equity issues, and community engagement. ----- ### "We've adopted the product and some of the staff\!" — 4.0/5 > **Jovoni** | *15. April 2025* | Non-Profit-Organisation Management | Empfehlungsbewertung: 7.0/10 > > **Vorteile**: The customization of platform is a highlight and the willingness of the team to provide a product that best fit our needs. There was a team effort to onboard our staff. Each person was knowledgeable about their particular area and was incredibly helpful. > > **Nachteile**: There are some quirks about the platform like, when printing a pdf the text in the blue box is black and difficult to read and the font color for a signal message is very light on the grantee dashboard side. > > At onset the pacing of the onboarding process was set well, and the team was very accommodating. The staff building the product frequently answering questions and willing to 'tinker' to service the need of our organization and the uniquities of having our membership agencies as grantees. During the initial testing process, we felt like we could have benefited from more guided instructions (we don't know what we don't know) and perceived that we needed more time during refinement as we had a different perspective/ understanding of how the system worked and needed to make the necessary adjustments. However, our team felt rushed by project management at times to complete the project ahead of schedule - but during meetings expectations/priorities were clearly discussed and interim meetings were held (in-between standing meetings) to ensure the quality of the product. ----- ### "Advocacy Funder Review" — 3.0/5 > **Leah** | *4. Mai 2022* | Non-Profit-Organisation Management | Empfehlungsbewertung: 5.0/10 > > **Vorteile**: Fluxx is highly configurable. You can set it up in so many ways. > > **Nachteile**: I purchased this software needing a budget management system. After months of research and testing (and being told by the marketing team), I believed it would meet our needs. Now that we are in the system, I see that the budget management aspect of the system is not configurable (although everything else in Fluxx is) and is badly built. I wouldn't recommend this product for anyone looking for budget management until they make some fixes. > > My team is liking Fluxx overall so far. As the person overseeing its setup, we are still rolling out the system and the jury is still out on if purchasing the system will be worth it or not. ----- ### "Overall a great platform" — 5.0/5 > **Tara** | *25. April 2025* | Gastgewerbe | Empfehlungsbewertung: 8.0/10 > > **Vorteile**: Fluxx is extremely adaptable to our program's unique needs. Our grantees and grant reviewers have both shared that they find the platform to be extremely intuitive and user friendly. Fluxx's implementation team takes the time to learn each organization's program, and doesn't stop until it's right. > > **Nachteile**: For the administrator, Fluxx has a steeper learning curve. Making changes to the site or a grant application sometimes involves liquid code and can be cumbersome and lead to errors. ----- ### "Fluxx Review" — 4.0/5 > **Michelle** | *5. Februar 2024* | Non-Profit-Organisation Management | Empfehlungsbewertung: 5.0/10 > > **Vorteile**: So far it is moving our old-school system of paper to an online system. It is allowing us to expand and reach more people and keep all the grantmaking information in one location. > > **Nachteile**: The system itself has nice features and is fairly intuitive. I do think some features can be improved. The system itself is good, but I think that the sales team and the implementation team need to have better communications on what is possible in the system and exactly what it looks like to relay to potential customers. I think that even having implementation experts on sales phone calls with serious, potential customers is necessary. Sales gave me high expectations on what was capable in the system for the splitting of our foundation and scholarship programs, which are from completely separate entities. However, reality was different and it was frustrating for me and my team, but im sure also frustrating and challenging for those helping implement our product. Plus, sales didn't seem to realize the scope of our needs or ask the right questions initially. The implementation specialists realized the scope of our needs fairly quickly, and realized how different some needs were compared to what everyone initially thought, leading to a change order. I know all companies struggle with this to some degree, but it would be my biggest recommendation for company improvement for more satisfied customers. If we had not had the complexity of these two separate entities using the same software, the implementation would have been a total breeze for the foundation. > > It has had its challenging moments but overall, the experience was good. ----- Seite: 1 / 5\ Zurück: [Nächste Seite](https://www.capterra.at/software/146625/fluxx-software-for-grantmakers?page=2) ## Links - [Auf Capterra anzeigen](https://www.capterra.at/software/146625/fluxx-software-for-grantmakers) ## Diese Seite ist in den folgenden Sprachen verfügbar | Sprache | URL | | de | | | de-AT | | | de-CH | | | en | | | en-AE | | | en-AU | | | en-CA | | | en-GB | | | en-IE | | | en-IL | | | en-IN | | | en-NZ | | | en-SG | | | en-ZA | | | es | | | es-AR | | | es-CL | | | es-CO | | | es-CR | | | es-DO | | | es-EC | | | es-MX | | | es-PA | | | es-PE | | | fr | | | fr-BE | | | fr-CA | | | fr-LU | | | it | | | nl | | | nl-BE | | | pt | | | pt-PT | | ----- ## Strukturierte Daten