--- description: Detaillierte Informationen über Felgo zu Benutzerfreundlichkeit, Funktionen, Kosten, Vor- und Nachteilen aus verifizierten Nutzer-Erfahrungen. Lies Ratings & Bewertungen und entdecke ähnliche Tools dank Capterra Austria. image: https://gdm-localsites-assets-gfprod.imgix.net/images/capterra/og_logo-e5a8c001ed0bd1bb922639230fcea71a.png?auto=format%2Cenhance%2Ccompress title: Felgo Kosten, Erfahrungen & Bewertungen - Capterra Österreich 2026 --- Breadcrumb: [Startseite](/) > [Programmiersoftware & Entwicklertools](/directory/30082/application-development/software) > [Felgo](/software/155371/v-play) # Felgo Canonical: https://www.capterra.at/software/155371/v-play Seite: 1 / 2\ Zurück: [Nächste Seite](https://www.capterra.at/software/155371/v-play?page=2) > Ein plattformübergreifendes Entwicklungstool mobile Apps, das auf Qt basiert und beispiellose Zeit- und Codeeinsparungen bietet. > > Bewertung: **4.7/5** von 9 Nutzern. Top bewertet für **Weiterempfehlungsquote**. ----- ## Übersicht ### Wer verwendet Felgo? Felgo ist für Leute oder Firmen gedacht, die erfolgreiche Mobile Apps mit geringem Aufwand erstellen wollen, ohne Kompromisse beim nativen Aussehen und der Leistung eingehen zu müssen. ## Kurzstatistiken und Ratings | Metrik | Bewertung | Detail | | **Gesamt** | **4.7/5** | 9 Nutzerbewertungen | | Bedienkomfort | 4.8/5 | Auf Basis der Gesamtbewertungen | | Kundenbetreuung | 4.3/5 | Auf Basis der Gesamtbewertungen | | Preis-Leistungs-Verhältnis | 4.9/5 | Auf Basis der Gesamtbewertungen | | Funktionen | 4.6/5 | Auf Basis der Gesamtbewertungen | | Empfehlungsprozentsatz | 90% | (9/10 Weiterempfehlungsquote) | ## Über den Anbieter - **Unternehmen**: FELGO - **Region**: vienna, Österreich - **Gegründet**: 2012 ## Gewerblicher Kontext - **Startpreis**: $ 79,00 - **Preismodell**: (Kostenlose Version verfügbar) (Gratis Testen) - **Zielgruppe**: Selbstständig, 2–10, 11–50, 51–200, 201–500, 501–1 000, 1 001–5 000, 5 001–10 000, 10 000+ - **Bereitstellungen und Plattformen**: Cloud, SaaS, webbasiert, Mac (Desktop), Windows (Desktop), Linux (Desktop), Android (mobil), iPhone (mobil), iPad (mobil) - **Unterstützte Sprachen**: Deutsch, Englisch - **Verfügbare Länder**: Österreich ## Funktionen - API - Debuggen - Grafische Benutzeroberfläche - Integrierte Entwicklungsumgebung - Kompatibilitätstests - Werkzeuge zur Zusammenarbeit ## Optionen für Kundensupport - E-Mail/Helpdesk - FAQ/Forum - Telefon-Support - 24/7 Live-Support - Chat ## Category - [Programmiersoftware & Entwicklertools](https://www.capterra.at/directory/30082/application-development/software) ## Alternativen 1. [IntelliJ IDEA](https://www.capterra.at/software/136010/intellij-idea) — 4.7/5 (1256 reviews) 2. [GitHub](https://www.capterra.at/software/129067/github) — 4.8/5 (6155 reviews) 3. [Essential Studio](https://www.capterra.at/software/32602/essential-studio) — 4.5/5 (903 reviews) 4. [Microsoft Visual Studio](https://www.capterra.at/software/101288/microsoft-visual-studio) — 4.6/5 (3004 reviews) 5. [Jira](https://www.capterra.at/software/19319/jira) — 4.4/5 (15312 reviews) ## Nutzerbewertungen ### "Why would I recommend Felgo to my peers?" — 5.0/5 > **David** | *10. Juni 2020* | Transport/Güterfrachtverkehr/Schienenverkehr | Empfehlungsbewertung: 10.0/10 > > **Vorteile**: CROSS-PLATFORM-DEVELOPMENT with native look It makes developing Apps for mobile phones (and desktop) easy and fast. The live code reloading makes it possible to test on several devices at the same time without rebuilding. Easy to integrate plugins like Firebase, OneSignal, Facebook.. Many easy to use ui-elements that look like native elements. Simple and easy-to-learn software structure. Cloud build > > **Nachteile**: A roadmap would be great. Means which features, functions are coming and what is currently being worked on > > The goal of the Killisperger app is to show the presence and sales opportunities on the smartphone of the customers as well as digitize some internal processes. The challenge for me as the only developer of the company is, to develop this app for android, iOS, and windows in the short time from January until June. For me, I only considered a cross-platform solution, because this already saves a lot of time. Due to my three years of experience with Qt, this framework was my first choice. However, I know Qt can work as a cross-platform solution but this framework is missing many components that have to be developed by myself. For example, in order to design an appealing ui, some ui elements have to be written by myself. But in the real world exists many different screen resolutions of the individual devices, and to solve the pixel calculation for the individual screen resolutions is difficult to manage. I realized the App within 3 Months and I implement currently significantly more features than expected. The app not only looks good, it also runs very stable on all operating systems ----- ### "Really fast multi-platform development cycles" — 5.0/5 > **Izcóatl** | *6. Februar 2021* | Computer-Software | Empfehlungsbewertung: 10.0/10 > > **Vorteile**: I was first attracted into getting to the "code once, deploy everywhere" paradigm that is part of their attention grabber. But I got really in love into the fast development cycle experience that I discovered. I thought at first that my learning curve would be a lengthy one. But I am really surprised at how fast the development cycle is and how far I have gotten into creating prototypes in just a week after downloading and installing it. It reminds me of the way I was used to creating fast and attractive apps when I developed under Adobe Flash. The dev cycle is really fast as I can get an almost instantaneous feedback on the changes that I make. And it is refreshing to see how I am able to target several platforms at once. The javascript plus QML combination made it really easy to pick up for me and I am certain sure that many devs can migrate from Web only into multi-platform in a fast manner. And there is also the possibility to implement C++ code if the need arises to support and bridge native libraries. I am also happy with the constant feedback that I am receiving from the team. Although most of it is marketing related, there are some interesting and valuable materials that they have been pushing to ease my learning. > > **Nachteile**: I believe that some points that are not so clear to me might be laying in the way that the Qt and QML related licensing models could intertwine with the projects that I am creating. It is not clear to me if there are additional fees or open-source licensing related constraints that must be taken into account to avoid compliance with the Qt licensing model. Of course, there are the many contact routes and emails that the team has sent to me and I am right now expecting for a more human-understandable way of approaching to licensing. There is also the way that the initial Splash Screen and loading phase that make the apps created feel like running in a container and not a real native experience. Although having this container framework seems to be true, I believe that a more sophisticated splash would help to better this odd feeling while the app loads. I am proud of having the Felgo logo starting my apps, but a more elegant solution would be in place. Or maybe there is something I must learn to change the way the app starts. Of course, there is the paid option where you can even remove the splash screen, but I don’t think this to be the real solution. > > I am right now creating internal prototypes to test different ideas. This is really a game changer on how I was planning to go during the next days, learning. I am now productive and the Felgo demo apps are real and complete spaces to start from. There is also the thing that you can make certain changes to your app without having to redeploy into stores. ----- ### "Highly recommended software" — 4.0/5 > **mohamed** | *15. April 2021* | Krankenhausversorgung & Gesundheitswesen | Empfehlungsbewertung: 8.0/10 > > **Vorteile**: I like this product in light of the fact that the quick improvement cycle experience that I found. I thought from the start that my expectation to absorb information would be a protracted one. However, I am truly amazed at how quick the improvement cycle is and how far I have gotten into making models in seven days subsequent to downloading and introducing it. It helps me to remember the manner in which I was accustomed to making quick and alluring applications when I created under Adobe Flash. > > **Nachteile**: Difficult to utilize its own custom QML part. ----- ### "Best tool for developing cross platform applications" — 5.0/5 > **Boluwatife** | *17. Mai 2022* | Informationstechnologie & -dienste | Empfehlungsbewertung: 10.0/10 > > **Vorteile**: Felgo Cloud Builds automates my workflows and saves me time for test and publish builds. The great variety of plugins/extensions/off-the-shelf components offered out-of-the-box (there are more than 200). The helpful, responsive customer support. In contrast to frameworks like Flutter, you can count on a professional team that can help you out if needed. > > **Nachteile**: It is hard to use at first but gets easier with time. ----- ### "Cross-platform SDK" — 4.0/5 > **Duruaku** | *14. Mai 2022* | Computer-Software | Empfehlungsbewertung: 10.0/10 > > **Vorteile**: The fact that I can build for both Android and ios as well as desktop at the same time. I enjoyed the live client for a while. > > **Nachteile**: The live client crashes when you use qwebview > > Overall. It's been great. Still working on it and learning more ----- Seite: 1 / 2\ Zurück: [Nächste Seite](https://www.capterra.at/software/155371/v-play?page=2) ## Links - [Auf Capterra anzeigen](https://www.capterra.at/software/155371/v-play) ## Diese Seite ist in den folgenden Sprachen verfügbar | Sprache | URL | | de | | | de-AT | | | de-CH | | | en | | | en-AE | | | en-AU | | | en-CA | | | en-GB | | | en-IE | | | en-IL | | | en-IN | | | en-NZ | | | en-SG | | | en-ZA | | | fr | | | fr-BE | | | fr-CA | | | fr-LU | | ----- ## Strukturierte Daten