--- description: Detaillierte Informationen über BrowserStack zu Benutzerfreundlichkeit, Funktionen, Kosten, Vor- und Nachteilen aus verifizierten Nutzer-Erfahrungen. Lies Ratings & Bewertungen und entdecke ähnliche Tools dank Capterra Austria. image: https://gdm-localsites-assets-gfprod.imgix.net/images/capterra/og_logo-e5a8c001ed0bd1bb922639230fcea71a.png?auto=format%2Cenhance%2Ccompress title: BrowserStack Kosten, Erfahrungen & Bewertungen - Capterra Österreich 2026 --- Breadcrumb: [Startseite](/) > [Prüfsoftware](/directory/30609/automated-testing/software) > [BrowserStack](/software/162900/browserstack) # BrowserStack Canonical: https://www.capterra.at/software/162900/browserstack Seite: 1 / 32\ Zurück: [Nächste Seite](https://www.capterra.at/software/162900/browserstack?page=2) > Ein browserübergreifendes Testwerkzeug zum Testen des reaktiven Designs. > > Bewertung: **4.6/5** von 774 Nutzern. Top bewertet für **Weiterempfehlungsquote**. ----- ## Übersicht ### Wer verwendet BrowserStack? Entwicklungsteams in verschiedenen Branchen, einschließlich, aber nicht beschränkt auf Finanzen und Versicherungen, Bildungswesen, Technologie, Medien und Publishing, Einzelhandel und viele andere. ## Kurzstatistiken und Ratings | Metrik | Bewertung | Detail | | **Gesamt** | **4.6/5** | 774 Nutzerbewertungen | | Bedienkomfort | 4.6/5 | Auf Basis der Gesamtbewertungen | | Kundenbetreuung | 4.4/5 | Auf Basis der Gesamtbewertungen | | Preis-Leistungs-Verhältnis | 4.2/5 | Auf Basis der Gesamtbewertungen | | Funktionen | 4.5/5 | Auf Basis der Gesamtbewertungen | | Empfehlungsprozentsatz | 90% | (9/10 Weiterempfehlungsquote) | ## Über den Anbieter - **Unternehmen**: BrowserStack - **Gegründet**: 2011 ## Gewerblicher Kontext - **Startpreis**: $ 39,00 - **Preismodell**: (Kostenlose Version verfügbar) (Gratis Testen) - **Zielgruppe**: Selbstständig, 2–10, 11–50, 51–200, 201–500, 501–1 000, 1 001–5 000, 5 001–10 000, 10 000+ - **Bereitstellungen und Plattformen**: Cloud, SaaS, webbasiert, Mac (Desktop), Windows (Desktop) - **Unterstützte Sprachen**: Englisch - **Verfügbare Länder**: Amerikanische Jungferninseln, Australien, Brasilien, Britische Jungferninseln, Deutschland, Dänemark, Indien, Irland, Israel, Kanada, Mexiko, Singapur, Südafrika, Vereinigte Arabische Emirate, Vereinigte Staaten, Vereinigtes Königreich ## Funktionen - Aktivitätsüberwachung - Alarmfunktion / Benachrichtigungen - Anforderungsmanagement - Anmerkungen - Anomalieerkennung - Archivierung & Aufbewahrung - Audit Trail - Automated Testing - Berichterstattung / Analyse - Compliance-Verfolgung - Continuous-Integration-Tools - Datenvisualisierung - Dokumentenmanagement - Engpass-Identifizierung - Lager-Management - Lastszenarien - Lasttests - Leistungskennzahlen - Leistungsmanagement - Management von Softwaretests - Mobile Tests - Multiple Test Types - Netzwerküberwachung - Performance-Tests - Problem-Nachverfolgung - Projektmanagement - Qualitätssicherung - Quantitative Metriken - Risikomanagement - Rückverfolgbarkeit - Störfallmanagement - Test-Management - Testskript-Bewertungen - Testskripts - Umfragen & Feedback - Unterstützt parallele Ausführung - Verfolgen von Fehlern - Versionskontrolle - Videoaufzeichnung / Transkription - Web-Tests - Werkzeuge zur Zusammenarbeit - Wirtschaftsprüfung-Management - Workflow-Management - Zielgruppen-Targeting - Zugriffskontrollen / Berechtigungen - hierarchische Ansicht - Überwachung ## Integrationen (16 insgesamt) - Appium - Bitbucket - CircleCI - Cypress - Espresso - GitHub - Jenkins - Jira - Microsoft Visual Studio - Netlify - Slack - Travis CI - Trello - Tricentis qTest - WordPress ... und 1 weitere Integrationen ## Optionen für Kundensupport - E-Mail/Helpdesk - FAQ/Forum - Wissensdatenbank - Telefon-Support - Chat ## Category - [Prüfsoftware](https://www.capterra.at/directory/30609/automated-testing/software) ## Ähnliche Kategorien - [Prüfsoftware](https://www.capterra.at/directory/30609/automated-testing/software) - [Bugtracker](https://www.capterra.at/directory/30090/bug-tracking/software) - [User Testing Software](https://www.capterra.at/directory/32295/user-testing/software) - [Lasttest-Tools](https://www.capterra.at/directory/32135/load-testing/software) - [Testmanagement-Tools](https://www.capterra.at/directory/34315/test-management-tools/software) ## Alternativen 1. [Tricentis qTest](https://www.capterra.at/software/173762/qtest) — 4.4/5 (27 reviews) 2. [TestRail](https://www.capterra.at/software/128204/testrail) — 4.3/5 (179 reviews) 3. [Testsigma](https://www.capterra.at/software/171626/testsigma) — 4.3/5 (19 reviews) 4. [Userlytics](https://www.capterra.at/software/181202/userlytics) — 4.7/5 (55 reviews) 5. [Userbrain](https://www.capterra.at/software/141082/userbrain) — 4.2/5 (88 reviews) ## Nutzerbewertungen ### "Reliable Cross Browser Testing Tool - Browserstack" — 5.0/5 > **Yash** | *2. April 2026* | Informationstechnologie & -dienste | Empfehlungsbewertung: 8.0/10 > > **Vorteile**: - I can test on alomst any real iphone or android model without needing the physical hardwhere. - It makes it very easy to test my local dev env even when i'm behind a company's VPN. - It works well with our existing Playwright and Pyhton automation scripts. > > **Nachteile**: - There's often a big lag between my mouse click \& the remote devide responding. - It can take 20 30 sec, just to start a session, which feels slow when you are in a hurry. - It's definitely on the expensive side, especially when you start adding parallel testing slots for the team. > > It's a good tool that has become a part of our workflow. It helps us catch CSS bugs and layout issues on mobile Safari that we just can't see on desktop emulators. While the speed could be better and the cost is high, the reliability of testing on real devices makes it worth it for a professional team. ----- ### "Comprehensive testing suite" — 4.0/5 > **Verifizierter Rezensent** | *25. April 2026* | E-Learning | Empfehlungsbewertung: 8.0/10 > > **Vorteile**: The breadth of offerings is very convenient. I feel like any time I have a testing need, I can find what I need to help our department. > > **Nachteile**: Pricing can get very onesy-twosy - meaning sometimes you feel like you are nickeled and dimed a bit. Perhaps some more bundling would be preferential. ----- ### "Okay, but not the best for Test Management" — 3.0/5 > **Jess** | *2. April 2026* | Computer-Software | Empfehlungsbewertung: 6.0/10 > > **Vorteile**: They have the right idea with Test Management but the execution is a little iffy. For example the drag and drop for copying a test case will work for a bit, then stop. Their support team is top tier. > > **Nachteile**: The bugs, the execution of Test Management is a little iffy. For example the drag and drop for copying a test case will work for a bit, then stop. > > Overall its neutral. We ended up switching to Qase for better/cheaper AI test case creation. BrowserStacks support team has been great through the various issues but we did run into a lot of issues. ----- ### "Simplifying Testing with Real Devices and Seamless Automation" — 4.0/5 > **Abin** | *24. März 2026* | Informationstechnologie & -dienste | Empfehlungsbewertung: 8.0/10 > > **Vorteile**: What I like most about BrowserStack is how easily it brings everything together in one place. I can quickly access a wide range of real devices and browsers for live testing, which makes debugging much faster and more reliable without needing to manage physical devices(using Live and App Live), while also avoiding the overhead of maintaining an in-house device lab. At the same time, the platform fits well into our automation workflow with Automate and App Automate, allowing us to run tests in parallel and integrate with CI/CD without much effort. It also helps keep things organized with its test management capabilities, so tracking and maintaining test cases becomes easier. Overall, it has made the entire testing process smoother and more efficient, and whenever I’ve needed help, the support team has been responsive and useful. > > **Nachteile**: One area where BrowserStack could improve is performance consistency at times, especially when using certain devices where sessions can feel slightly slow or laggy depending on network conditions. Also, while the platform offers a lot of features, it can take some time to fully explore and get comfortable with everything, especially for new users. Occasionally, debugging automation failures can require extra effort due to limited visibility compared to local environments. That said, these are relatively minor compared to the overall benefits the platform provides. > > Overall, my experience with BrowserStack has been very positive. It makes both manual and automated testing easier by providing quick access to real devices and browsers, without the need for managing infrastructure. It fits well into daily workflows, from quick debugging to running automated tests, and has helped improve testing speed and efficiency. While there are occasional minor performance lags, it remains a reliable and valuable tool for the QA process. ----- ### "Genuinely solved our cross-platform testing headache" — 5.0/5 > **Chirag** | *12. Mai 2026* | Informationstechnologie & -dienste | Empfehlungsbewertung: 9.0/10 > > **Vorteile**: - The real device coverage is what sold me. Pixel, Samsung Galaxy series, Xiaomi, OnePlus, older Motorola devices - they are all there. For Flutter and Ionic builds especially, this matters because the rendering can behave very differently on OEM skins than on a clean Pixel emulator. - App Live is fast. Drag an APK or IPA in, pick a device, and you are testing within a minute. No cable, no adb, no "why won't my Mac see this phone today." - The dev tools inside the session are genuinely useful - Logcat, network inspection, device logs, screenshots, screen recording. I can actually debug a remote device almost like it's plugged in. - App Automate plays nicely with our CI. We use it with GitHub Actions and it just runs. The Appium support is solid for both native Android and Flutter/Ionic test suites. - Network throttling and GPS simulation have caught real bugs for us - stuff like map features breaking on slow 3G, or location permissions behaving oddly in certain regions. - The iOS side is equally good, which matters because as a Flutter/Ionic developer I'm constantly switching between platforms and don't want a separate tool for each. > > **Nachteile**: - Pricing. Once you want parallel test runs for a real CI setup, the cost climbs fast. For a small team or solo developer it's a real consideration. - Older devices are sometimes laggy or freeze partway through a session. Usually a reconnect fixes it but it breaks flow. - App installs occasionally fail the first time, especially on certain Xiaomi or Huawei devices. Retry usually works but it's annoying. - Session timeouts on the cheaper plans feel short when you're doing thorough manual QA. > > Honestly, before BrowserStack we were juggling a drawer full of old phones and a bunch of emulators, and it was a mess. Half the bugs we'd find in production were things like "works on Pixel, breaks on Samsung" or "fine on Android 12, weird padding on Android 10." Now most of that gets caught before release. It's not perfect, and the pricing makes me wince sometimes, but I would struggle to go back to how we worked before. ----- Seite: 1 / 32\ Zurück: [Nächste Seite](https://www.capterra.at/software/162900/browserstack?page=2) ## Links - [Auf Capterra anzeigen](https://www.capterra.at/software/162900/browserstack) ## Diese Seite ist in den folgenden Sprachen verfügbar | Sprache | URL | | de | | | de-AT | | | de-CH | | | en | | | en-AE | | | en-AU | | | en-CA | | | en-GB | | | en-IE | | | en-IL | | | en-IN | | | en-NZ | | | en-SG | | | en-ZA | | | es | | | es-AR | | | es-CL | | | es-CO | | | es-CR | | | es-DO | | | es-EC | | | es-MX | | | es-PA | | | es-PE | | | fr | | | fr-BE | | | fr-CA | | | fr-LU | | | it | | | nl | | | nl-BE | | | pl | | | pt | | | pt-PT | | | sv | | ----- ## Strukturierte Daten