--- description: Detaillierte Informationen über Digital Yard zu Benutzerfreundlichkeit, Funktionen, Kosten, Vor- und Nachteilen aus verifizierten Nutzer-Erfahrungen. Lies Ratings & Bewertungen und entdecke ähnliche Tools dank Capterra Austria. image: https://gdm-localsites-assets-gfprod.imgix.net/images/capterra/og_logo-e5a8c001ed0bd1bb922639230fcea71a.png?auto=format%2Cenhance%2Ccompress title: Digital Yard Kosten, Erfahrungen & Bewertungen - Capterra Österreich 2026 --- Breadcrumb: [Startseite](/) > [Yard-Management-Systeme](/directory/31058/yard-management/software) > [Digital Yard](/software/170800/yms) # Digital Yard Canonical: https://www.capterra.at/software/170800/yms Seite: 1 / 2\ Zurück: [Nächste Seite](https://www.capterra.at/software/170800/yms?page=2) > PINC ist das führende Yard-Managementsystem. > > Bewertung: **4.8/5** von 20 Nutzern. Top bewertet für **Weiterempfehlungsquote**. ----- ## Übersicht ### Wer verwendet Digital Yard? Alle Branchen wie Lebensmittel- und Getränkeherstellung, Lebensmitteleinzelhandel, CPG-Herstellung, Automobil- und Schwerindustrie, Einzelhandel und Logistikunternehmen von Drittanbietern. ## Kurzstatistiken und Ratings | Metrik | Bewertung | Detail | | **Gesamt** | **4.8/5** | 20 Nutzerbewertungen | | Bedienkomfort | 4.7/5 | Auf Basis der Gesamtbewertungen | | Kundenbetreuung | 4.7/5 | Auf Basis der Gesamtbewertungen | | Preis-Leistungs-Verhältnis | 4.6/5 | Auf Basis der Gesamtbewertungen | | Funktionen | 4.5/5 | Auf Basis der Gesamtbewertungen | | Empfehlungsprozentsatz | 100% | (10/10 Weiterempfehlungsquote) | ## Über den Anbieter - **Unternehmen**: Kaleris - **Gegründet**: 2004 ## Gewerblicher Kontext - **Zielgruppe**: Selbstständig, 2–10, 11–50, 51–200, 201–500, 501–1 000, 1 001–5 000, 5 001–10 000, 10 000+ - **Bereitstellungen und Plattformen**: Cloud, SaaS, webbasiert - **Unterstützte Sprachen**: Englisch - **Verfügbare Länder**: Albanien, Andorra, Australien, Belarus, Belgien, Bosnien und Herzegowina, Bulgarien, Deutschland, Dänemark, Estland, Finnland, Frankreich, Färöer, Gibraltar, Griechenland, Grönland, Guernsey, Irland, Island, Isle of Man und 35 weitere ## Funktionen - Real-Time Data - Terminplanung - Versandmanagement ## Optionen für Kundensupport - E-Mail/Helpdesk - FAQ/Forum - Wissensdatenbank - Telefon-Support - 24/7 Live-Support - Chat ## Category - [Yard-Management-Systeme](https://www.capterra.at/directory/31058/yard-management/software) ## Alternativen 1. [GoRamp](https://www.capterra.at/software/204639/goramp) — 4.8/5 (15 reviews) 2. [Samsara](https://www.capterra.at/software/167543/samsara-for-fleets-0-00-6-23) — 4.5/5 (944 reviews) 3. [TradeLink](https://www.capterra.at/software/1041750/tradelink) — 4.4/5 (22 reviews) 4. [LOGIFLY](https://www.capterra.at/software/1029080/logifly) — 4.6/5 (14 reviews) 5. [Opendock](https://www.capterra.at/software/1020762/opendock) — 4.6/5 (104 reviews) ## Nutzerbewertungen ### "Easy to use" — 5.0/5 > **Mark** | *18. Jänner 2025* | Öl & Energie | Empfehlungsbewertung: 10.0/10 > > **Vorteile**: Ease of use, especially setting everything up. > > **Nachteile**: Streamlined version would be preferred. We lose time in the office inputting data that is not relevant. > > Easy to use but sometimes bulky. Dispatchers need fast results. ----- ### "Pioneering a new way to automate" — 5.0/5 > **Christopher** | *20. Februar 2020* | Informationstechnologie & -dienste | Empfehlungsbewertung: 10.0/10 > > **Vorteile**: The PINC application has made it possible to automate a process that was performed either manually or on home grown applications that were difficult to manage, weren't robust, and were prone to failure. We worked with the engineering team at PINC to develop an automated process where our sequence requirements were generated by us, transmitted to PINC, and then to our over the road carriers and yard drivers. The visibility of the containers in the application has become an integral part of our operation. > > **Nachteile**: The ability to change the yard configuration or to verify receipt of data can be cumbersome. The engineering team is willing to work with us, but the team appears to be small which means you can get the feeling of being in a "take a number" situation. The turnaround time on changes can often take longer than my management expects, but we are usually asking for significant changes. > > Overall I am pleased with the experience with utilizing the PINC solution. I marked down the customer service portion, but that is more reflective of accounting issues or engineering delays. Our project manager was\\is amazing. He spent the weeks leading up to the rollout on site with us and felt like a member of the staff. He follows up regularly and is the main driver behind the success of our implementation. PINC has become a named portion of our IT landscape. ----- ### "Yard Management or is it Warehouse Management" — 4.0/5 > **Jeff** | *10. August 2018* | Transport/Güterfrachtverkehr/Schienenverkehr | Empfehlungsbewertung: 7.0/10 > > **Vorteile**: Yard visibility - both jockeys and assets > > **Nachteile**: Fragile system, limited reader distance/scope > > Content customer, improved yard moves from what we believe was 6/hour to 9/hour, on average. ----- ### "Thinking about a new or better YMS for your facility? Start here...." — 5.0/5 > **Keith** | *13. Juni 2022* | Lebensmittelproduktion | Empfehlungsbewertung: 10.0/10 > > **Vorteile**: Ease of use. From the time an asset enters the yard until the time it departs, you know where it's located, how long it's been here, what's on it, and what will be used for in real time\! All done on a system that is very user friendly. Carrier access. With your carrier partners having access, they can help manage their fleet within your yard leading to quicker turns and increased productivity for both entities. > > **Nachteile**: The reporting capability is outstanding. However, some configurations require in-putting same parameters over and over again during a "page back" situation. > > This system gets an "A" grade for ease of use, reporting capabilities, increased productivity from yard team, automated reporting to carrier partners. The support team, no matter digital or mechanical, are always 100% available to solve issues. You call or email, you get a reply.... quickly. A+ for that team. ----- ### "Yard management usage" — 5.0/5 > **Rick** | *3. August 2018* | Transport/Güterfrachtverkehr/Schienenverkehr | Empfehlungsbewertung: 10.0/10 > > **Vorteile**: One of the top things that is really good about this system . It is right there inside the cab of the truck . Very visible for the driver driver friendly easy to read and understand. less noise to and from the customer. Easy to keep the yard updated on where assess are. Allows the drivers the opportunity to find equipment a lot faster. It also allows the crew to work better as a team. > > **Nachteile**: One of the things I don’t like about the system is the drivers cannot talk back through the system to the inside supervisors. It would be nice if the driver could type a message into the system back to the leads in regards to locating or not being able to locate a trailer. This would give more clarity to the system . > > I thought my overall experience starts at the top. The support team at PINC is outstanding. As long as we have been with why YMS I have never experienced a bad experience but call in the Support system . They are always helpful and insightful. I’m sure there is still more to know about the system that would benefit both the support team and the customer. I welcome any opportunity to participate in brainstorming or more feedback. I have enjoyed the system and I believe it’s a great value to our customers. ----- Seite: 1 / 2\ Zurück: [Nächste Seite](https://www.capterra.at/software/170800/yms?page=2) ## Links - [Auf Capterra anzeigen](https://www.capterra.at/software/170800/yms) ## Diese Seite ist in den folgenden Sprachen verfügbar | Sprache | URL | | de | | | de-AT | | | de-CH | | | en | | | en-AE | | | en-AU | | | en-CA | | | en-GB | | | en-IE | | | en-IL | | | en-IN | | | en-NZ | | | en-SG | | | en-ZA | | | es | | | es-AR | | | es-CL | | | es-CO | | | es-CR | | | es-DO | | | es-EC | | | es-MX | | | es-PA | | | es-PE | | | fr | | | fr-BE | | | fr-CA | | | fr-LU | | | it | | | nl | | | nl-BE | | | pt | | | pt-PT | | ----- ## Strukturierte Daten