--- description: Detaillierte Informationen über Publer zu Benutzerfreundlichkeit, Funktionen, Kosten, Vor- und Nachteilen aus verifizierten Nutzer-Erfahrungen. Lies Ratings & Bewertungen und entdecke ähnliche Tools dank Capterra Austria. image: https://gdm-localsites-assets-gfprod.imgix.net/images/capterra/og_logo-e5a8c001ed0bd1bb922639230fcea71a.png?auto=format%2Cenhance%2Ccompress title: Publer Kosten, Erfahrungen & Bewertungen - Capterra Österreich 2026 --- Breadcrumb: [Startseite](/) > [Social Media Management Tools](/directory/30939/social-media-management/software) > [Publer](/software/177145/publer) # Publer Canonical: https://www.capterra.at/software/177145/publer Seite: 1 / 40\ Zurück: [Nächste Seite](https://www.capterra.at/software/177145/publer?page=2) > Arbeite mit anderen zusammen, plane und analysiere deine Beiträge für Facebook, Instagram, Twitter, LinkedIn, Pinterest und Google My Business. > > Bewertung: **4.8/5** von 978 Nutzern. Top bewertet für **Weiterempfehlungsquote**. ----- ## Übersicht ### Wer verwendet Publer? Cloudbasierte Social-Media-Marketing-Plattform, mit der Unternehmen jeder Größe automatische Planung, Massenbeiträge, Teamzusammenarbeit, Links, Medien-Uploads und mehr mit nutzerdefinierten Beiträgen und Analysen verwalten können. ## Kurzstatistiken und Ratings | Metrik | Bewertung | Detail | | **Gesamt** | **4.8/5** | 978 Nutzerbewertungen | | Bedienkomfort | 4.8/5 | Auf Basis der Gesamtbewertungen | | Kundenbetreuung | 4.7/5 | Auf Basis der Gesamtbewertungen | | Preis-Leistungs-Verhältnis | 4.7/5 | Auf Basis der Gesamtbewertungen | | Funktionen | 4.6/5 | Auf Basis der Gesamtbewertungen | | Empfehlungsprozentsatz | 90% | (9/10 Weiterempfehlungsquote) | ## Über den Anbieter - **Unternehmen**: Kalemi Code - **Gegründet**: 2017 ## Gewerblicher Kontext - **Startpreis**: $ 5,00 - **Preismodell**: (Kostenlose Version verfügbar) (Gratis Testen) - **Zielgruppe**: Selbstständig, 2–10, 11–50, 51–200, 1 001–5 000, 5 001–10 000, 10 000+ - **Bereitstellungen und Plattformen**: Cloud, SaaS, webbasiert, Android (mobil), iPhone (mobil) - **Unterstützte Sprachen**: Deutsch, Englisch, Französisch, Spanisch - **Verfügbare Länder**: Albanien, Argentinien, Australien, Bolivien, Brasilien, Chile, Deutschland, Ecuador, Falklandinseln, Frankreich, Französisch-Guayana, Guyana, Indien, Irland, Italien, Kanada, Kolumbien, Mexiko, Neuseeland, Niederlande und 11 weitere ## Funktionen - Berichterstattung / Analyse - Kampagnenmanagement - Nachterminierung - Verwaltung mehrerer Konten - Werkzeuge zur Zusammenarbeit ## Integrationen (2 insgesamt) - Canva - Instagram ## Optionen für Kundensupport - E-Mail/Helpdesk - Wissensdatenbank - Chat ## Category - [Social Media Management Tools](https://www.capterra.at/directory/30939/social-media-management/software) ## Ähnliche Kategorien - [Social Media Management Tools](https://www.capterra.at/directory/30939/social-media-management/software) - [Social Media Analyse Tools](https://www.capterra.at/directory/31655/social-media-analytics-tools/software) ## Alternativen 1. [Instagram](https://www.capterra.at/software/210721/instagram) — 4.7/5 (5224 reviews) 2. [Zoho Social](https://www.capterra.at/software/159351/zoho-social) — 4.7/5 (3480 reviews) 3. [Hootsuite](https://www.capterra.at/software/121701/hootsuite) — 4.4/5 (3803 reviews) 4. [Buffer](https://www.capterra.at/software/143492/buffer) — 4.5/5 (1492 reviews) 5. [HubSpot Marketing Hub](https://www.capterra.at/software/171840/hubspot-marketing) — 4.5/5 (6258 reviews) ## Nutzerbewertungen ### "Sehr gutes Produkt" — 5.0/5 > **Thomas** | *1. April 2025* | Versicherung | Empfehlungsbewertung: 8.0/10 > > **Vorteile**: Mir gefällt die Einfachheit und die der günstige Preis. > > **Nachteile**: Aktuell finde ich keine Nachteile, die mir ins Auge stechen > > Die Erfahrung ist aktuell gut. Ich konnte sehr schnell mit dem Produkt arbeiten. ----- ### "Very good product and cheaper then competitors\!" — 5.0/5 > **Marko** | *5. August 2025* | Gesundheit, Wellness & Fitness | Empfehlungsbewertung: 9.0/10 > > **Vorteile**: Very easy to use and understand – great UI for quick scheduling and content planning. I like the calender in it very much and the multi picture post feature > > **Nachteile**: Please improve analytics with deeper insights and reports to match competitors like Metricool. thanks > > All in all, a solid 8/10 – great tool with potential to become even better with deeper analytics.... ----- ### "Keep it small and simple" — 5.0/5 > **Thomas** | *2. Dezember 2024* | Unternehmensberatung | Empfehlungsbewertung: 10.0/10 > > **Vorteile**: Simple, yet powerful way to handle your social network accounts, price/function is good. > > **Nachteile**: Can be a bit slow. UI is not as intuitive as in other saas. ----- ### "A flexible scheduler with an API good enough to build on" — 5.0/5 > **Rodrigo** | *14. August 2026* | Marketing & Werbung | Empfehlungsbewertung: 10.0/10 > > **Vorteile**: Genuine flexibility and an API you can actually build on. Multiple workspaces, granular account handling, recycling and bulk scheduling all behave sanely, and the pricing scales with the accounts I really use instead of pushing me into an oversized tier. The API is the standout: clean documentation, predictable endpoints, and a support team that engages with technical questions properly. I connect it to Claude Code and automate drafting, scheduling and queue maintenance end to end, which no other tool at this price point let me do cleanly. > > **Nachteile**: The feature set is broad, so the first hour is a bit of exploring before you find everything, and a few advanced scheduling options sit deeper in the UI than they need to. I would also like more end-to-end examples in the API docs for fully automated workflows. Nothing here has cost me anything meaningful in daily use. > > I've used Publer daily for client and in-house social work and it has become infrastructure rather than just another scheduling tool. It is flexible, sensibly priced for what you get, and - unusually for this category - properly programmable. Strongly recommended for professionals and agencies, especially anyone who wants to automate rather than click. ----- ### "Great for Bulk Scheduling & Custom Workflows" — 5.0/5 > **Verifizierter Rezensent** | *14. September 2026* | Marketing & Werbung | Empfehlungsbewertung: 8.0/10 > > **Vorteile**: Publer fits my workflow unusually well because it gives me both bulk scheduling and API access without forcing me into a much more expensive enterprise-style setup. I manage a fairly high-volume Facebook content workflow, so being able to bulk schedule both image posts and text-only background posts is important. Publer is one of the few tools I found that supports the latter properly, which was actually one of the main reasons I switched from Buffer. The API access is probably the biggest advantage for me personally. I originally used Make for automation, but I’ve since moved most of the workflow to custom Python scripts. Publer’s API gives me enough flexibility to automate scheduling, pull analytics data, and push the data into my own Google Sheets reporting system. Another feature I really appreciate is how scheduled posts are handled when you change your posting schedule. If I already have a month of content scheduled and later change the posting frequency or time slots, Publer doesn’t reshuffle the posts that are already scheduled. That sounds minor, but it makes a big difference when you’re managing a large content queue. Buffer used to shift the existing queue whenever I changed the schedule, which was frustrating. The competitor analytics are useful too. Being able to monitor things like posting frequency and engagement gives me a quick overview of how my own content compares. Reliability has also been excellent. I haven’t had a single failed post so far. That’s been a noticeable improvement from my previous experience with Buffer, where I would occasionally get failed posts. > > **Nachteile**: The analytics could be clearer in a few areas, especially Facebook Reach. Facebook now emphasizes Views, while Publer reports Reach as unique views. The numbers don’t line up with Facebook’s own reporting, and there isn’t an obvious way for me to independently verify what Publer is showing. Because of that, I don’t really rely on the Reach metric. The API documentation is generally useful and helped me build my setup, but there were a few areas where I felt the documentation could have gone into more detail. Pricing is also a bit of a mixed bag for me. I had to move to the Business plan because I wanted both API access and analytics, so I’m paying more than I previously paid with Buffer. I’d personally love to see those features available on the Professional plan. The mobile app is useful when I’m away from my laptop, although I find the interface a bit cluttered. I mostly want quick access to the things I actually use, and there’s quite a lot going on in the app that feels unnecessary for my workflow. > > My experience with Publer has been very positive. There was a bit more setup than with Buffer, especially when I first started integrating it into my automation workflow, but once everything was configured, it became much more flexible. What I like most is that Publer doesn’t force me into using the product in one particular way. I can use the normal scheduling interface when I want to, bulk schedule large batches of content, or build my own automation around the API. That flexibility has become increasingly valuable as my workflow has grown more customized. I also appreciate that the product seems to be actively developed. There are still things I’d like improved, particularly around analytics, API documentation, plan limitations, and mobile access, but overall I’m very happy with what I’m getting for the price. ----- Seite: 1 / 40\ Zurück: [Nächste Seite](https://www.capterra.at/software/177145/publer?page=2) ## Links - [Auf Capterra anzeigen](https://www.capterra.at/software/177145/publer) ## Diese Seite ist in den folgenden Sprachen verfügbar | Sprache | URL | | de | | | de-AT | | | de-CH | | | en | | | en-AE | | | en-AU | | | en-CA | | | en-GB | | | en-IE | | | en-IL | | | en-IN | | | en-NZ | | | en-SG | | | en-ZA | | | es | | | es-AR | | | es-CL | | | es-CO | | | es-CR | | | es-DO | | | es-EC | | | es-MX | | | es-PA | | | es-PE | | | fr | | | fr-BE | | | fr-CA | | | fr-LU | | | it | | | nl | | | nl-BE | | | pt | | | pt-PT | | ----- ## Strukturierte Daten