--- description: Detaillierte Informationen über Ant Media Server zu Benutzerfreundlichkeit, Funktionen, Kosten, Vor- und Nachteilen aus verifizierten Nutzer-Erfahrungen. Lies Ratings & Bewertungen und entdecke ähnliche Tools dank Capterra Austria. image: https://gdm-localsites-assets-gfprod.imgix.net/images/capterra/og_logo-e5a8c001ed0bd1bb922639230fcea71a.png?auto=format%2Cenhance%2Ccompress title: Ant Media Server Kosten, Erfahrungen & Bewertungen - Capterra Österreich 2026 --- Breadcrumb: [Startseite](/) > [Streaming-Software](/directory/31755/live-streaming/software) > [Ant Media Server](/software/183566/ant-media-server) # Ant Media Server Canonical: https://www.capterra.at/software/183566/ant-media-server Seite: 1 / 8\ Zurück: [Nächste Seite](https://www.capterra.at/software/183566/ant-media-server?page=2) > Ant Media bietet einsatzbereite, skalierbare Echtzeit-Video-Streaming-Lösungen für Live-Video-Streaming-Anforderungen. > > Bewertung: **4.8/5** von 156 Nutzern. Top bewertet für **Weiterempfehlungsquote**. ----- ## Übersicht ### Wer verwendet Ant Media Server? Medienhäuser, Bildungseinrichtungen, Auktionshäuser, Radio- und Fernsehsender, Unternehmen, Dienstleister, Regierungsbehörden und Entwickler von mobilen Apps bzw. webbasierten Anwendungen ## Kurzstatistiken und Ratings | Metrik | Bewertung | Detail | | **Gesamt** | **4.8/5** | 156 Nutzerbewertungen | | Bedienkomfort | 4.7/5 | Auf Basis der Gesamtbewertungen | | Kundenbetreuung | 4.8/5 | Auf Basis der Gesamtbewertungen | | Preis-Leistungs-Verhältnis | 4.6/5 | Auf Basis der Gesamtbewertungen | | Funktionen | 4.6/5 | Auf Basis der Gesamtbewertungen | | Empfehlungsprozentsatz | 90% | (9/10 Weiterempfehlungsquote) | ## Über den Anbieter - **Unternehmen**: Ant Media - **Region**: Ankara, Türkei - **Gegründet**: 2016 ## Gewerblicher Kontext - **Startpreis**: $ 109,00 - **Preismodell**: (Kostenlose Version verfügbar) (Gratis Testen) - **Zielgruppe**: Selbstständig, 2–10, 11–50, 51–200, 201–500, 501–1 000, 1 001–5 000, 5 001–10 000, 10 000+ - **Bereitstellungen und Plattformen**: Cloud, SaaS, webbasiert, Mac (Desktop), Windows (Desktop), Linux (Desktop), Windows (On-Premise), Linux (On-Premise), Android (mobil), iPhone (mobil), iPad (mobil) - **Unterstützte Sprachen**: Englisch - **Verfügbare Länder**: Argentinien, Australien, Bolivien, Brasilien, Chile, Deutschland, Ecuador, Falklandinseln, Frankreich, Französisch-Guayana, Guyana, Indien, Irland, Italien, Kanada, Kolumbien, Mexiko, Neuseeland, Niederlande, Paraguay und 10 weitere ## Funktionen - Aufzeichnung - Berichterstattung / Analyse - Echtzeit-Chat - Echtzeit-Übertragung - Interaktion mit Zielgruppen - Leistungsüberwachung - Livestream-Produktion - Mehrere Kamera-Feeds - Mobiler Zugriff - Multi-Channel-Vertrieb - Präsentations-Streaming - Sitzungsaufzeichnung - Social-Media-Streaming - Teilen in sozialen Medien - Video-Streaming - Zwei-Wege-Audio und -Video ## Integrationen (21 insgesamt) - AWS CloudFormation - Amazon S3 - Android 11 - Azure Blob Storage - CentOS Linux - FFmpeg - Kubernetes - Linode - MongoDB - NGINX - NVIDIA GPU Cloud (NGC) - OAuth - Okta - Private GPU Cloud - Red Hat Enterprise Linux ... und 6 weitere Integrationen ## Optionen für Kundensupport - E-Mail/Helpdesk - FAQ/Forum - Wissensdatenbank - Telefon-Support - Chat ## Category - [Streaming-Software](https://www.capterra.at/directory/31755/live-streaming/software) ## Ähnliche Kategorien - [Streaming-Software](https://www.capterra.at/directory/31755/live-streaming/software) - [Video Management Software](https://www.capterra.at/directory/30754/video-management/software) - [Videokonferenz Software](https://www.capterra.at/directory/31895/video-conferencing/software) ## Alternativen 1. [Zoom Workplace](https://www.capterra.at/software/144037/zoom-video-conferencing) — 4.6/5 (14624 reviews) 2. [TikTok](https://www.capterra.at/software/1019949/tiktok) — 4.6/5 (646 reviews) 3. [Ecamm Live](https://www.capterra.at/software/196795/ecamm-live) — 4.8/5 (174 reviews) 4. [Castr](https://www.capterra.at/software/187026/castr) — 4.7/5 (446 reviews) 5. [Dacast](https://www.capterra.at/software/122710/dacast-web-conferencing) — 4.3/5 (230 reviews) ## Nutzerbewertungen ### "Scalable, Developer-Friendly Ultra low latency Streaming Solution with Great Value" — 5.0/5 > **Rahul** | *16. Februar 2026* | Informationstechnologie & -dienste | Empfehlungsbewertung: 10.0/10 > > **Vorteile**: We used Ant Media Server primarily for mass broadcasting and real-time video streaming use cases, and it has been a solid, reliable solution. The SDKs and APIs are well-designed and easy to integrate into web, desktop (using electron) and mobile applications. Documentation is clear, and implementation is straightforward for me as a developer. WebRTC performance is excellent for real-time broadcasting consider 1-1 call or one to many. Security: Token-based authentication, stream-level security, and access control features are robust and flexible. We were able to integrate it securely within our existing architecture without major customization. Architecture Fit: Ant Media fit seamlessly into our application architecture. We deployed it in a scalable environment and integrated it with our backend services and CDN layer without friction. We have implemented this in the following technologies (Node, react, angular, nextjs, laravel, react native, wordpress). If i talk about learning curve, It is between easy and moderate. If you have prior experience with streaming technologies (RTMP, WebRTC, HLS), onboarding is quite smooth. Even for teams new to WebRTC, the documentation and sample projects make it manageable. I had tried "kurento", "wowza" and some open source media server in my early days. It was really very frustrating to debug issues and get resolved. With Ant Media Server, you need not to worry about streaming issues anymore. Just focus on your business. Now I say: Streaming means Ant media Server. What they are providing is really value for money, For every business use case they have best plans available to subscribe. I tested their 14 days free trial before integrating into my live streaming platform. Plugin development on top of Ant Media Server is very helpful for developers to create some new features and functionality. > > **Nachteile**: Not exactly a negative, but during initial setup we needed clarification on a few configuration and scaling aspects. However, their support team responded very quickly and provided clear guidance. So while some areas required clarification, support quality compensated for it. I am very impressed with their improvement on auto-scaling setup, In initial times, it was a long process. Now a days it will take max 5-10 minutes for the setup. > > Overall, our experience is very positive. Ant Media Server has proven to be stable, scalable, ultra low latency and production-ready for every size of broadcasting scenarios. It would not be an exaggeration to say that Ant Media Server is one of the best products I have worked with. The product quality is excellent, and the performance is consistently reliable. Equally impressive is their support team. highly responsive, knowledgeable, and genuinely committed to helping customers succeed. Once you partner with them, they support you throughout the journey and ensure you reach your goals with confidence. ----- ### "Scalable, Self-Hosted Live Streaming That Delivers — Great Product, Even Better Support" — 5.0/5 > **Aditya** | *27. Mai 2026* | E-Learning | Empfehlungsbewertung: 9.0/10 > > **Vorteile**: We use Ant Media Server to power live classes for our edtech platform, serving students across tier 2/3 cities in India. The biggest win for us is the HLS streaming with CloudFront CDN integration — our origin server pushes a single HLS stream to CloudFront, and CloudFront handles delivery to thousands of concurrent students. This means practically zero load on our servers regardless of how many students are watching. The clustering architecture with Origin/Edge separation and auto-scaling on AWS is clean and well thought out. We run a GPU-enabled origin for transcoding and adaptive bitrate, with non-GPU edge nodes — cost-effective split that gives students smooth playback even on patchy mobile networks in smaller cities. The AWS Marketplace AMI and CloudFormation template made initial deployment fast. It runs on standard Ubuntu EC2 instances — full SSH access, no vendor lock-in, and the REST API integrated easily with our Spring Boot backend. For any team that needs a self-hosted, scalable live streaming solution without per-viewer SaaS pricing, Ant Media with HLS + CloudFront is a solid, production-ready setup. > > **Nachteile**: The main issue we faced was with the CloudFormation template in the documentation — there were a few mistakes in it that caused cluster setup failures during deployment. Debugging those took a significant amount of time since the errors weren't obvious (e.g., the change\_server\_mode script silently failing in non-interactive UserData). For a team relying on the docs to get up and running quickly, this can be frustrating. That said, the support experience more than made up for it. Every time I raised an issue over email, I got a proper, detailed response and they were quick to schedule calls to walk through the problem. Special thanks to \[sensitive content hidden\] for the consistent support throughout — always responsive and genuinely helpful in getting things resolved. > > Solid experience overall. Initial deployment had some bumps due to documentation issues in the CloudFormation template, but the product itself is reliable and performant. Our HLS + CloudFront setup handles thousands of concurrent students without breaking a sweat. The support team is genuinely helpful — responsive emails, quick to schedule calls, and \[sensitive content hidden\] deserves a special mention for going above and beyond throughout our setup. If you need a self-hosted, scalable streaming solution without per-viewer pricing, Ant Media is a strong choice. Just be prepared to spend some extra time on initial infrastructure setup. ----- ### "Ant Media Review" — 5.0/5 > **Mohamed** | *22. April 2026* | Computer-Software | Empfehlungsbewertung: 3.0/10 > > **Vorteile**: The simplicity of integration, and it easy to manage, which a lot of option to manage my resources with i couldn't find anywhere else > > **Nachteile**: Like i sad before it have step by step guide to integrate with programming language / framework and grate, in addition to the video stream, and make meetings app are more simple it spotless > > I think more than great, specially if measure it from a cost wise,it will give you a value for money you spend and it cheaper, then all the providers, and when have a greate support which are available to help me in every problem i have ----- ### "A Solid Live Streaming Platform" — 4.0/5 > **Verifizierter Rezensent** | *23. April 2026* | Informationstechnologie & -dienste | Empfehlungsbewertung: 8.0/10 > > **Vorteile**: I’ve been using Ant Media for live streaming over the past five years. One of the things I appreciate most is its stability when handling thousands of concurrent viewers. The available plugins are also a major advantage, especially for security and customization, which make it much easier to protect and manage streams effectively. > > **Nachteile**: The main drawbacks I’ve noticed are the inaccurate viewer count for HLS streams, as well as limited advanced viewer insights and monitoring capabilities. > > Overall, I’ve had a very positive experience with Ant Media over the years. The platform has proven to be reliable and scalable, especially when handling large numbers of concurrent viewers during live streams. Its stability is one of its strongest points, giving confidence that streams will remain smooth even under heavy load. Another major advantage is the availability of plugins, which allow for extensive customization and enhanced security. These features make it much easier to protect streams, manage access, and tailor the platform to specific project requirements. This flexibility has been especially useful in building secure and controlled streaming environments. That said, there are still some areas that could be improved. In particular, the viewer count for HLS streams is not always accurate, and the platform lacks more advanced viewer analytics and monitoring tools. Having deeper insights into viewer behavior and real time statistics would make the platform even more powerful. Despite these limitations, my overall experience has been very good, and Ant Media continues to be a solid choice for live streaming solutions. ----- ### "Perfect for a Student Streaming Project, but Not a Walk in the Park" — 5.0/5 > **Rachit** | *10. Juni 2026* | Hochschulbildung | Empfehlungsbewertung: 10.0/10 > > **Vorteile**: But what sets OBS apart from others is its ultra-low latency WebRTC streaming. While conducting my project of streaming our campus event broadcasts, we noticed the near-zero delay in streaming, which made a huge difference, allowing viewers to interact in real time. Another aspect worth mentioning regarding video streaming was the high-quality streaming, which worked fine at 1080p on our outdated lab server. On the other hand, I should point out the fact that the entire Security aspect remains under our complete control since hosting the server on our university internal network allowed us to guarantee the security of our faculty requirements. All features provided by OBS Community Edition are impressive: WebRTC, RTMP, HLS, REST API, and Scribe plugin. As an experiment, I tried using AI-powered automatic subtitles; they do work if audio is decent. The installation script helped me launch the core functionality in no time, while proper configuration will give one a full feeling of being in control. > > **Nachteile**: Ease of Use, however, is where the trouble starts. The web management console resembles something from a dashboard of a machine designed by an engineer back in 2010 — everything works, yet it feels very much dated. Learning Curve was quite steep since I had to learn about the intricacies of working with streaming technologies and understand how exactly apps, streams, and nodes interact with each other. Content Management system can hardly be called so; one would have access only to raw information about currently active streams. There is no feature for searching and archiving previous broadcasts, which made the process of conducting tests somewhat complicated. For Video Content creation such as scheduling broadcasts or even creating a basic VOD library, extra scripting or additional tools will have to be used. Our use of mobile SDK resulted in black-screen errors with React Native, thus, web-based viewers had to be used instead. Lastly, although the core server itself is pretty safe, the access control and authentication are poorly documented. > > This was my very first experience with using a real-time streaming engine and although at first I found it quite challenging, the end result was definitely worth it. It only took me less than an hour to set up the server on Ubuntu, but tuning the streaming settings became a challenge – this is when the Learning Curve kicked in. However, after everything came together, I was impressed with how good the Video performance was and the extra Security provided by self-hosting added to the authenticity of our project. The Features of WebRTC support, RTMP ingestion, and REST API helped us create a basic dashboard to control our event stream. Lack of Content Management functionality, however, required us to manage our recordings directly from the file system. Although having AI subtitling plugin was a good plus, it wasn't ready yet to be used in production. All in all, I think that Ant Media Server can be a great platform for engineering students to learn about live video streaming protocols. ----- Seite: 1 / 8\ Zurück: [Nächste Seite](https://www.capterra.at/software/183566/ant-media-server?page=2) ## Links - [Auf Capterra anzeigen](https://www.capterra.at/software/183566/ant-media-server) ## Diese Seite ist in den folgenden Sprachen verfügbar | Sprache | URL | | de | | | de-AT | | | de-CH | | | en | | | en-AE | | | en-AU | | | en-CA | | | en-GB | | | en-IE | | | en-IL | | | en-IN | | | en-NZ | | | en-SG | | | en-ZA | | | es | | | es-AR | | | es-CL | | | es-CO | | | es-CR | | | es-DO | | | es-EC | | | es-MX | | | es-PA | | | es-PE | | | fr | | | fr-BE | | | fr-CA | | | fr-LU | | | it | | | ja | | | pl | | | pt | | | pt-PT | | | tr | | ----- ## Strukturierte Daten