--- description: Detaillierte Informationen über Ant Media Server zu Benutzerfreundlichkeit, Funktionen, Kosten, Vor- und Nachteilen aus verifizierten Nutzer-Erfahrungen. Lies Ratings & Bewertungen und entdecke ähnliche Tools dank Capterra Austria. image: https://gdm-localsites-assets-gfprod.imgix.net/images/capterra/og_logo-e5a8c001ed0bd1bb922639230fcea71a.png?auto=format%2Cenhance%2Ccompress title: Ant Media Server Kosten, Erfahrungen & Bewertungen - Capterra Österreich 2026 --- Breadcrumb: [Startseite](/) > [Streaming-Software](/directory/31755/live-streaming/software) > [Ant Media Server](/software/183566/ant-media-server) # Ant Media Server Canonical: https://www.capterra.at/software/183566/ant-media-server Seite: 1 / 8\ Zurück: [Nächste Seite](https://www.capterra.at/software/183566/ant-media-server?page=2) > Ant Media bietet einsatzbereite, skalierbare Echtzeit-Video-Streaming-Lösungen für Live-Video-Streaming-Anforderungen. > > Bewertung: **4.8/5** von 159 Nutzern. Top bewertet für **Weiterempfehlungsquote**. ----- ## Übersicht ### Wer verwendet Ant Media Server? Medienhäuser, Bildungseinrichtungen, Auktionshäuser, Radio- und Fernsehsender, Unternehmen, Dienstleister, Regierungsbehörden und Entwickler von mobilen Apps bzw. webbasierten Anwendungen ## Kurzstatistiken und Ratings | Metrik | Bewertung | Detail | | **Gesamt** | **4.8/5** | 159 Nutzerbewertungen | | Bedienkomfort | 4.7/5 | Auf Basis der Gesamtbewertungen | | Kundenbetreuung | 4.8/5 | Auf Basis der Gesamtbewertungen | | Preis-Leistungs-Verhältnis | 4.6/5 | Auf Basis der Gesamtbewertungen | | Funktionen | 4.6/5 | Auf Basis der Gesamtbewertungen | | Empfehlungsprozentsatz | 90% | (9/10 Weiterempfehlungsquote) | ## Über den Anbieter - **Unternehmen**: Ant Media - **Region**: Ankara, Türkei - **Gegründet**: 2016 ## Gewerblicher Kontext - **Startpreis**: $ 109,00 - **Preismodell**: (Kostenlose Version verfügbar) (Gratis Testen) - **Zielgruppe**: Selbstständig, 2–10, 11–50, 51–200, 201–500, 501–1 000, 1 001–5 000, 5 001–10 000, 10 000+ - **Bereitstellungen und Plattformen**: Cloud, SaaS, webbasiert, Mac (Desktop), Windows (Desktop), Linux (Desktop), Windows (On-Premise), Linux (On-Premise), Android (mobil), iPhone (mobil), iPad (mobil) - **Unterstützte Sprachen**: Englisch - **Verfügbare Länder**: Argentinien, Australien, Bolivien, Brasilien, Chile, Deutschland, Ecuador, Falklandinseln, Frankreich, Französisch-Guayana, Guyana, Indien, Irland, Italien, Kanada, Kolumbien, Mexiko, Neuseeland, Niederlande, Paraguay und 10 weitere ## Funktionen - Aufzeichnung - Berichterstattung / Analyse - Echtzeit-Chat - Echtzeit-Übertragung - Interaktion mit Zielgruppen - Leistungsüberwachung - Livestream-Produktion - Mehrere Kamera-Feeds - Mobiler Zugriff - Multi-Channel-Vertrieb - Präsentations-Streaming - Sitzungsaufzeichnung - Social-Media-Streaming - Teilen in sozialen Medien - Video-Streaming - Zwei-Wege-Audio und -Video ## Integrationen (21 insgesamt) - AWS CloudFormation - Amazon S3 - Android 11 - Azure Blob Storage - CentOS Linux - FFmpeg - Kubernetes - Linode - MongoDB - NGINX - NVIDIA GPU Cloud (NGC) - OAuth - Okta - Private GPU Cloud - Red Hat Enterprise Linux ... und 6 weitere Integrationen ## Optionen für Kundensupport - E-Mail/Helpdesk - FAQ/Forum - Wissensdatenbank - Telefon-Support - Chat ## Category - [Streaming-Software](https://www.capterra.at/directory/31755/live-streaming/software) ## Ähnliche Kategorien - [Streaming-Software](https://www.capterra.at/directory/31755/live-streaming/software) - [Video Management Software](https://www.capterra.at/directory/30754/video-management/software) - [Videokonferenz Software](https://www.capterra.at/directory/31895/video-conferencing/software) ## Alternativen 1. [Zoom Workplace](https://www.capterra.at/software/144037/zoom-video-conferencing) — 4.6/5 (14689 reviews) 2. [TikTok](https://www.capterra.at/software/1019949/tiktok) — 4.6/5 (656 reviews) 3. [Ecamm Live](https://www.capterra.at/software/196795/ecamm-live) — 4.8/5 (174 reviews) 4. [Castr](https://www.capterra.at/software/187026/castr) — 4.7/5 (446 reviews) 5. [Dacast](https://www.capterra.at/software/122710/dacast-web-conferencing) — 4.3/5 (230 reviews) ## Nutzerbewertungen ### "Antmedia - video engine backend for live streaming platform" — 5.0/5 > **Norbert** | *5. November 2025* | Informationstechnologie & -dienste | Empfehlungsbewertung: 10.0/10 > > **Vorteile**: Technology , innovations, ease of use, documentation and customer support of course. Video with low latency. > > **Nachteile**: There is nothing to describe here. Maybe add more payment possibilities for Antmedia License purchase. > > As a owner of new developing app for live streaming I am really satisfied with everything. My DevOps team is also happy with this software. ----- ### "Strong Performance, But Needs Better UX and Monitoring" — 4.0/5 > **Hieu** | *22. April 2026* | Informationstechnologie & -dienste | Empfehlungsbewertung: 8.0/10 > > **Vorteile**: - Offers competitive pricing while still delivering solid performance and scalability - The support team is responsive and knowledgeable, especially for complex setups or troubleshooting scenarios - The WebRTC-based streaming provides very low latency and works well for real-time use cases like live events or conferencing - Offers APIs, integration capabilities, and customization options that make it suitable for engineering teams building tailored solutions - Supports cloud, on-premise, and clustered deployments, making it adaptable for different architectures > > **Nachteile**: - The Admin interface can feel unintuitive, especially for new users or when managing complex workflows. - Difficult debugging and troubleshooting – When issues occur, it can be hard to identify root causes due to limited diagnostics and observability tools. - Monitoring is limited and not insightful – Metrics are mostly raw numbers (CPU, bitrate, etc.) without clear indication of how they affect streaming quality or user experience. - Complex setup for advanced use cases – Advanced configurations (e.g., clustering, scaling, GPU usage) require strong technical expertise and are not beginner-friendly. - Documentation could be deeper for edge cases – While basic docs exist, more detailed guidance is needed for complex scenarios. - Support quality can vary in effectiveness – Although responsive, some solutions provided are not always practical or fully resolve the issue. > > Overall, my experience with Ant Media Server has been fairly positive. It offers strong value for money and good performance, especially for low-latency streaming. Customer support is responsive, though the solutions are not always fully effective. On the downside, the Admin UI is not very user-friendly, and debugging issues can be difficult. The monitoring tools also lack clarity, as they show raw metrics without clearly indicating how they affect streaming quality. ----- ### "Ant Media Review" — 5.0/5 > **Mohamed** | *22. April 2026* | Computer-Software | Empfehlungsbewertung: 3.0/10 > > **Vorteile**: The simplicity of integration, and it easy to manage, which a lot of option to manage my resources with i couldn't find anywhere else > > **Nachteile**: Like i sad before it have step by step guide to integrate with programming language / framework and grate, in addition to the video stream, and make meetings app are more simple it spotless > > I think more than great, specially if measure it from a cost wise,it will give you a value for money you spend and it cheaper, then all the providers, and when have a greate support which are available to help me in every problem i have ----- ### "Low-Latency Streaming Solution with Great Support" — 5.0/5 > **Diego** | *30. Juni 2026* | Buchhaltung | Empfehlungsbewertung: 9.0/10 > > **Vorteile**: I have had an excellent experience with Ant Media Server. The platform is easy to set up, performs reliably, and delivers low-latency streaming with great video quality. The interface is intuitive, making it easy to manage streams even without a steep learning curve. The feature set is comprehensive, and the security options provide confidence when deploying production applications. One of the highlights is the responsive and knowledgeable support team, who are always ready to help when needed. Overall, Ant Media Server has exceeded my expectations, and I highly recommend it for anyone looking for a professional live streaming solution. > > **Nachteile**: Excellent streaming performance, very low latency, easy deployment, user-friendly interface, reliable stability, and outstanding customer support. The platform offers a rich set of features while remaining simple to use. > > There is a slight learning curve when configuring advanced features, but the documentation and support team make the process much easier. Other than that, I have no significant complaints. ----- ### "A Solid Live Streaming Platform" — 4.0/5 > **Verifizierter Rezensent** | *23. April 2026* | Informationstechnologie & -dienste | Empfehlungsbewertung: 8.0/10 > > **Vorteile**: I’ve been using Ant Media for live streaming over the past five years. One of the things I appreciate most is its stability when handling thousands of concurrent viewers. The available plugins are also a major advantage, especially for security and customization, which make it much easier to protect and manage streams effectively. > > **Nachteile**: The main drawbacks I’ve noticed are the inaccurate viewer count for HLS streams, as well as limited advanced viewer insights and monitoring capabilities. > > Overall, I’ve had a very positive experience with Ant Media over the years. The platform has proven to be reliable and scalable, especially when handling large numbers of concurrent viewers during live streams. Its stability is one of its strongest points, giving confidence that streams will remain smooth even under heavy load. Another major advantage is the availability of plugins, which allow for extensive customization and enhanced security. These features make it much easier to protect streams, manage access, and tailor the platform to specific project requirements. This flexibility has been especially useful in building secure and controlled streaming environments. That said, there are still some areas that could be improved. In particular, the viewer count for HLS streams is not always accurate, and the platform lacks more advanced viewer analytics and monitoring tools. Having deeper insights into viewer behavior and real time statistics would make the platform even more powerful. Despite these limitations, my overall experience has been very good, and Ant Media continues to be a solid choice for live streaming solutions. ----- Seite: 1 / 8\ Zurück: [Nächste Seite](https://www.capterra.at/software/183566/ant-media-server?page=2) ## Links - [Auf Capterra anzeigen](https://www.capterra.at/software/183566/ant-media-server) ## Diese Seite ist in den folgenden Sprachen verfügbar | Sprache | URL | | de | | | de-AT | | | de-CH | | | en | | | en-AE | | | en-AU | | | en-CA | | | en-GB | | | en-IE | | | en-IL | | | en-IN | | | en-NZ | | | en-SG | | | en-ZA | | | es | | | es-AR | | | es-CL | | | es-CO | | | es-CR | | | es-DO | | | es-EC | | | es-MX | | | es-PA | | | es-PE | | | fr | | | fr-BE | | | fr-CA | | | fr-LU | | | it | | | ja | | | pl | | | pt | | | pt-PT | | | tr | | ----- ## Strukturierte Daten