--- description: Detaillierte Informationen über LILT zu Benutzerfreundlichkeit, Funktionen, Kosten, Vor- und Nachteilen aus verifizierten Nutzer-Erfahrungen. Lies Ratings & Bewertungen und entdecke ähnliche Tools dank Capterra Austria. image: https://gdm-localsites-assets-gfprod.imgix.net/images/capterra/og_logo-e5a8c001ed0bd1bb922639230fcea71a.png?auto=format%2Cenhance%2Ccompress title: LILT Kosten, Erfahrungen & Bewertungen - Capterra Österreich 2026 --- Breadcrumb: [Startseite](/) > [Translation-Management-Systeme](/directory/30934/translation-management/software) > [LILT](/software/204322/lilt) # LILT Canonical: https://www.capterra.at/software/204322/lilt Seite: 1 / 5\ Zurück: [Nächste Seite](https://www.capterra.at/software/204322/lilt?page=2) > Lilt sorgt mit menschenbasierten, KI-fähigen Übersetzungsdiensten und -software für qualitativ hochwertige Inhalte und schnellere Durchlaufzeiten. > > Bewertung: **4.4/5** von 85 Nutzern. Top bewertet für **Weiterempfehlungsquote**. ----- ## Übersicht ### Wer verwendet LILT? Lilt bedient Kunden aus den Bereichen Unternehmens- und Verbrauchertechnologie, Einzelhandel und E-Commerce, Fertigung, Gaming, Finanzdienstleistungen, Gesundheitswesen und Behörden. ## Kurzstatistiken und Ratings | Metrik | Bewertung | Detail | | **Gesamt** | **4.4/5** | 85 Nutzerbewertungen | | Bedienkomfort | 4.5/5 | Auf Basis der Gesamtbewertungen | | Kundenbetreuung | 4.2/5 | Auf Basis der Gesamtbewertungen | | Preis-Leistungs-Verhältnis | 4.3/5 | Auf Basis der Gesamtbewertungen | | Funktionen | 4.3/5 | Auf Basis der Gesamtbewertungen | | Empfehlungsprozentsatz | 80% | (8/10 Weiterempfehlungsquote) | ## Über den Anbieter - **Unternehmen**: LILT ## Gewerblicher Kontext - **Zielgruppe**: Selbstständig, 201–500, 501–1 000, 1 001–5 000, 5 001–10 000, 10 000+ - **Bereitstellungen und Plattformen**: Cloud, SaaS, webbasiert, Mac (Desktop), Windows (Desktop), Linux (On-Premise) - **Unterstützte Sprachen**: Englisch - **Verfügbare Länder**: Vereinigte Staaten ## Funktionen - Daten-Import / -Export - Dokumentenmanagement - Lokalisierung-Automatisierung - Maschinelle Übersetzung - Mehrsprachig - Projekt-Nachverfolgung - Projektmanagement - Prozess-/Workflow-Automatisierung - Self-Service Portal - Spracherkennung - Terminologie-Management - Third-Party Integrations - Werkzeuge zur Zusammenarbeit - Workflow-Management ## Integrationen (28 insgesamt) - Adobe Commerce - Adobe Experience Manager - Box - Braze - CaptionHub - Contentful - Crowdin - Drupal - Figma - Git - GitHub - GitLab - Google Cloud - Google Drive - Helpshift ... und 13 weitere Integrationen ## Optionen für Kundensupport - E-Mail/Helpdesk - FAQ/Forum - Wissensdatenbank - Chat ## Category - [Translation-Management-Systeme](https://www.capterra.at/directory/30934/translation-management/software) ## Ähnliche Kategorien - [Translation-Management-Systeme](https://www.capterra.at/directory/30934/translation-management/software) - [KI Tools](https://www.capterra.at/directory/30938/artificial-intelligence/software) - [Software für öffentliche Verwaltung](https://www.capterra.at/directory/20048/government/software) ## Alternativen 1. [Crowdin](https://www.capterra.at/software/163509/crowdin) — 4.7/5 (175 reviews) 2. [Google Translate](https://www.capterra.at/software/1013631/google-translate) — 4.5/5 (687 reviews) 3. [Bureau Works](https://www.capterra.at/software/189130/bureau-works) — 4.8/5 (118 reviews) 4. [DeepL Pro](https://www.capterra.at/software/219412/deepl-pro) — 4.7/5 (154 reviews) 5. [Tolgee](https://www.capterra.at/software/1039225/tolgee) — 4.6/5 (95 reviews) ## Nutzerbewertungen ### "Very pleased so far\!" — 5.0/5 > **Jelena** | *4. April 2025* | Übersetzung und Lokalisierung | Empfehlungsbewertung: 10.0/10 > > **Vorteile**: Good communication, flexible deadlines, easy platform to work with > > **Nachteile**: It's not always very consisent with the amount of work, as often is the case with freelance work > > I haven't been working with them long and I'm currently doing my first bigger project but everything is going smooth and well so far, the communication with \[sensitive content hidden\] is great and she responds to all my questions and listens to my feedback ----- ### "Happy to work with and willing to be part of" — 5.0/5 > **Michele Fardini Soares 👩🏻‍💻 ⚙️ 💡** | *4. April 2025* | Übersetzung und Lokalisierung | Empfehlungsbewertung: 10.0/10 > > **Vorteile**: The opportunity to work with different accounts and fields. I can utilize my skills in the Life Sciences for one task, but in another, I can apply my skills to technology, the music industry, and social media. I have been learning a lot because I can exercise and gain new knowledge from this experience, as I am always willing to grow. > > **Nachteile**: When I receive an email from LILT announcing a project to work on, and after some milliseconds, it is already unavailable. It's frustrating, and I got upset. It is almost impossible to get the job. I try to do it on my smartphone (iPhone), but I often have page errors, telling me that Chrome, Safari, Mozilla, and other browsers are not compatible. I have already reported this issue to PMs and support, but I continue experiencing problems. Additionally, I would like to inform you about the payment terms. It took too much time to complete the job—some of them, more than 45 days. > > I am proud to work for LILT. I already know many people from the team, and I received support; everyone helped when it was necessary. I have consistently demonstrated my interest in being part of the LILT team. As an engineer passionate about technology and language, I have a clear plan to utilize my knowledge of project management to become a Project Manager at LILT. I hope to join the LILT team, working remotely and collaborating with a team. ----- ### "Make Lilt a Better Place for Translators and Clients" — 5.0/5 > **Ning** | *5. April 2025* | Übersetzung und Lokalisierung | Empfehlungsbewertung: 8.0/10 > > **Vorteile**: Quick AI-enhanced TM-based machine tanslation and reliable and transparent payments. > > **Nachteile**: 1. The least I like about Lilt is its current task assignment mechanism, a first-come, first-served system triggered by email notifications. Seemingly simple and straightforward, it fosters an environment prone to inefficiency and potential abuse. This system incentivizes a "race to the bottom," where translators may accept projects exceeding their expertise or available time simply to secure work. This ultimately risks delivering subpar translations, harming both client satisfaction and the platform's reputation. Furthermore, the reliance on speed of response opens the door for sophisticated bots or scripts to automatically claim assignments, leaving qualified human translators at a disadvantage. This undermines fair competition and potentially leads to a decline in overall translation quality. 2. Another annoying thing is that sometimes inconsistence can be found among accepted TMs. > > My experience with Lilt has been positive on the whole. The platform's interface is intuitive and user-friendly, particularly the in-context editor which allows for efficient translation. The payment system is generally reliable and transparent, which is crucial for freelancers. Finally, the availability of various project types and clients offers some degree of diversification in workload. The one thing I think needs to be improved is its task assignment mechanism. A more sophisticated approach would prioritize factors beyond speed of response. A system incorporating translator profiles, skills matching, and project-specific qualifications would be fairer, more efficient, and ultimately contribute to higher-quality translations. ----- ### "A good concept where some things fail" — 3.0/5 > **Thomas** | *6. April 2025* | Übersetzung und Lokalisierung | Empfehlungsbewertung: 10.0/10 > > **Vorteile**: The Contextual AI engine works really well, and the payments are allways on time. > > **Nachteile**: Project teams raffle many jobs, who is the fastes in accepting gets the Job. This creates an atmosphere of competition instead a team consciousness. > > The tool works well, the job lists are a bit unclear, the jobs change their position each time you open them. Quality of fuzzy matches is often low, so I have the impression that quality control in German is failing. Seems there is no competent linguistic instance to oversee overall quality- ----- ### "A Smart and Translator-Friendly Platform" — 5.0/5 > **Leo** | *4. April 2025* | Übersetzung und Lokalisierung | Empfehlungsbewertung: 10.0/10 > > **Vorteile**: What I appreciate most about Lilt is how its AI actually learns from me as I translate. It doesn’t just throw generic suggestions—it starts adapting to my style, which makes my work faster and more natural. The interface is clean, easy to use, and doesn’t get in the way of my workflow. Plus, I’ve never had any issues with payments—they’re always on time, which is something every freelancer values. > > **Nachteile**: There are times when the platform lags, especially with larger files, which can be frustrating when I’m working on a tight deadline. I also wish there were more options for managing glossaries—sometimes I need more control over terminology to match specific client preferences. > > Lilt has been a great platform to work with. The AI assistance helps speed up my workflow without making me feel like I’m losing control over my translations. It’s not perfect—no tool is—but it’s one of the few platforms that actually feels like it’s working with me rather than just giving me suggestions to correct. If they keep improving the system and adding more flexibility, it could become an even stronger tool for professional translators. ----- Seite: 1 / 5\ Zurück: [Nächste Seite](https://www.capterra.at/software/204322/lilt?page=2) ## Links - [Auf Capterra anzeigen](https://www.capterra.at/software/204322/lilt) ## Diese Seite ist in den folgenden Sprachen verfügbar | Sprache | URL | | de | | | de-AT | | | de-CH | | | en | | | en-AE | | | en-AU | | | en-CA | | | en-GB | | | en-IE | | | en-IL | | | en-IN | | | en-NZ | | | en-SG | | | en-ZA | | | es | | | es-AR | | | es-CL | | | es-CO | | | es-CR | | | es-DO | | | es-EC | | | es-MX | | | es-PA | | | es-PE | | | fr | | | fr-BE | | | fr-CA | | | fr-LU | | | it | | | nl | | | nl-BE | | | pt | | | pt-PT | | | sv | | ----- ## Strukturierte Daten