--- description: Detaillierte Informationen über Basecamp zu Benutzerfreundlichkeit, Funktionen, Kosten, Vor- und Nachteilen aus verifizierten Nutzer-Erfahrungen. Lies Ratings & Bewertungen und entdecke ähnliche Tools dank Capterra Austria. image: https://gdm-localsites-assets-gfprod.imgix.net/images/capterra/og_logo-e5a8c001ed0bd1bb922639230fcea71a.png?auto=format%2Cenhance%2Ccompress title: Basecamp Kosten, Erfahrungen & Bewertungen - Capterra Österreich 2026 --- Breadcrumb: [Startseite](/) > [Collaboration Tools](/directory/15/collaboration/software) > [Basecamp](/software/56808/basecamp) # Basecamp Canonical: https://www.capterra.at/software/56808/basecamp Seite: 1 / 578\ Zurück: [Nächste Seite](https://www.capterra.at/software/56808/basecamp?page=2) > Weltweit vertrauen Millionen auf Basecamp - alles an einem Ort, was du brauchst, um deine Arbeit zu erledigen. > > Bewertung: **4.3/5** von 14419 Nutzern. Top bewertet für **Weiterempfehlungsquote**. ----- ## Übersicht ### Wer verwendet Basecamp? Unternehmer, Freiberufler, kleine Unternehmen und Gruppen großer Organisationen. ## Kurzstatistiken und Ratings | Metrik | Bewertung | Detail | | **Gesamt** | **4.3/5** | 14419 Nutzerbewertungen | | Bedienkomfort | 4.3/5 | Auf Basis der Gesamtbewertungen | | Kundenbetreuung | 4.3/5 | Auf Basis der Gesamtbewertungen | | Preis-Leistungs-Verhältnis | 4.2/5 | Auf Basis der Gesamtbewertungen | | Funktionen | 4.2/5 | Auf Basis der Gesamtbewertungen | | Empfehlungsprozentsatz | 80% | (8/10 Weiterempfehlungsquote) | ## Über den Anbieter - **Unternehmen**: Basecamp - **Region**: Chicago, USA - **Gegründet**: 1999 ## Gewerblicher Kontext - **Startpreis**: $ 15,00 - **Preismodell**: (Kostenlose Version verfügbar) (Gratis Testen) - **Zielgruppe**: Selbstständig, 2–10, 11–50, 51–200, 201–500, 501–1 000, 1 001–5 000, 5 001–10 000, 10 000+ - **Bereitstellungen und Plattformen**: Cloud, SaaS, webbasiert, Mac (Desktop), Windows (Desktop), Android (mobil), iPhone (mobil), iPad (mobil) - **Unterstützte Sprachen**: Englisch - **Verfügbare Länder**: Afghanistan, Albanien, Algerien, Amerikanisch-Samoa, Amerikanische Jungferninseln, Andorra, Angola, Anguilla, Antigua und Barbuda, Argentinien, Armenien, Aruba, Aserbaidschan, Australien, Bahamas, Bahrain, Bangladesch, Barbados, Belarus, Belgien und 207 weitere ## Funktionen - @mentions - Aktivitäts-/Newsfeeds - Aktivitäts-Dashboard - Alarmfunktion / Benachrichtigungen - Anpassbare Vorlagen - Aufgaben-Fortschrittsverfolgung - Aufgabenmanagement - Aufgabenmanagement - Berichterstattung / Projektverfolgung - Berichterstattung und Statistik - Chat / Messaging - Discussions/Forums - Dokumentenmanagement - Drag-and-Drop - Echtzeit-Chat - Filesharing - Fortschrittsverfolgung - Ideenmanagement - Kalenderverwaltung - Kommentare / Notizen - Kommunikationsmanagement - Live-Chat - Meilensteinverfolgung - Mobiler Zugriff - Priorisierung - Produkt-Roadmaps - Projekt-Nachverfolgung - Projektplanung/Terminierung - Rollen-basierte Genehmigung - Sub-Task Management - Suchen / filtern - Task Editing - Termin-Fristenmanagement - Textnachrichtenversand - Third-Party Integrations - Umfragen & Feedback - Werkzeuge zur Zusammenarbeit - Workflow-Konfiguration - Workflow-Management - Zeitverfolgung - Zugriffskontrollen / Berechtigungen ## Integrationen (93 insgesamt) - AgencyDots - Akita - Apideck - Asana - AssessTEAM - Bridge24 - BrightGauge - Calamari - Centreli - Claritee - ClicData - ClickUp - Clockify - CoSchedule Marketing Suite - Cyfe ... und 78 weitere Integrationen ## Optionen für Kundensupport - E-Mail/Helpdesk - FAQ/Forum - Wissensdatenbank - 24/7 Live-Support - Chat ## Category - [Collaboration Tools](https://www.capterra.at/directory/15/collaboration/software) ## Ähnliche Kategorien - [Collaboration Tools](https://www.capterra.at/directory/15/collaboration/software) - [Projektmanagement Tools](https://www.capterra.at/directory/30002/project-management/software) - [Task Management Tools](https://www.capterra.at/directory/10030/task-management/software) - [Team-Kommunikation Software](https://www.capterra.at/directory/31033/team-communication/software) - [Projektmanagement Tools für gemeinnützige Organisationen](https://www.capterra.at/directory/32439/project-management-software-for-nonprofits/software) ## Alternativen 1. [Clockify](https://www.capterra.at/software/169607/clockify) — 4.8/5 (9243 reviews) 2. [Jira](https://www.capterra.at/software/19319/jira) — 4.4/5 (15371 reviews) 3. [Asana](https://www.capterra.at/software/120550/asana-pm) — 4.5/5 (13574 reviews) 4. [Trello](https://www.capterra.at/software/1010321/trello) — 4.5/5 (23533 reviews) 5. [monday.com](https://www.capterra.at/software/147657/monday-com) — 4.6/5 (6037 reviews) ## Nutzerbewertungen ### "A Clear and Simple Way to Manage Work" — 4.0/5 > **Abby** | *24. September 2025* | Marketing & Werbung | Empfehlungsbewertung: 7.0/10 > > **Vorteile**: Here are the top reasons Basecamp works well for our team: • Somewhat intuitive and easy to onboard new team members. • Centralizes communication: message boards, chat, automatic check-ins that we can house with designated project spaces. • Encourages organized structure – for each project, you can keep tasks, files, discussions all in context, reducing emails or other project management tools. > > **Nachteile**: Some challenges we've had: • There are some missing advanced project management features like task dependencies, subtasks and more robust reporting. • Limited flexibility/customization: our workflow is complex (multiple phases, branching, conditional flows), Basecamp has felt restrictive at times. • Notifications are sometimes overwhelming with the amount of to-dos we input. Sometimes we miss or lose track of important alerts. • We have found issues with inconsistency between desktop app notifications and the web version. The desktop app works better for me. • No built-in time tracking, which would be nice given we have to submit timesheets. > > We've used Basecamp for over a year across our 10-person marketing team. Overall, it’s been valuable for keeping communication, project tasks, and file management in one place. It's especially helpful given most of our team is remote. However, there are trade-offs. There are things that work well and what could be improved, from my perspective. If your team values simplicity, clarity and housing discussions/tasks/files in one unified workspace, Basecamp is a strong tool. For organizations pursuing highly detailed project planning, deep customization or advanced analytics, you may find there are limitations. ----- ### "It is ok for managing everything mostly" — 4.0/5 > **Keir** | *24. Jänner 2026* | Computer-Software | Empfehlungsbewertung: 8.0/10 > > **Vorteile**: My coffee has gone cold and this desk is to small for 2 monitors but Basecamp manages the sprint without blowing up. I was pleasantly surprised the AI formatted my notes correctly, unlike other programs that create chaos with them. We do all our frontend and QA ticketing thru Basecamp, it is nice that they do not vanish into thin air. They also provide us with an additional view of the board and calendar, which is whatever. > > **Nachteile**: The most frustrating thing about Basecamp is sometimes it seems like they put to much emphasis on features and I lose track of where things are located, especially finding the CRM section. The largest pain point is I am unable to enable my camera when I am creating a video clip for the team, which makes zero sense. > > The first thing I used was Trello, but it broke pretty soon at more than a couple of employees and I had to buy Basecamp. This system provides the client with an opportunity to see their own, proof and marketing schedule, taking out a lot of phone calls. Less usage of Slack as well, since comments are related directly to each task. ----- ### "Not the most user-friendly app" — 3.0/5 > **Caitie** | *27. März 2026* | Gesundheit, Wellness & Fitness | Empfehlungsbewertung: 6.0/10 > > **Vorteile**: I didn't find basecamp to be very user friendly, the interface is a bit scattered and confusing, and I didn't like the way it was organized. > > **Nachteile**: The interface, the difficulty of finding where things were, and the constant confusion when trying to navigate within the app. > > I wasn't impressed with basecamp overall. As mentioned I had a tough time finding where things were and staying organized in the app. ----- ### "Small Scale Project Management" — 3.0/5 > **Matilda** | *12. Mai 2026* | Hochschulbildung | Empfehlungsbewertung: 4.0/10 > > **Vorteile**: I like that it was fairly easy to set up different projects\! It was nice to see all to dos in one space and keep an eye on all the projects you're working on. > > **Nachteile**: It wasn't the best for complex projects. A lot of our projects can span multiple years and cross different teams and I found Basecamp lacked the infrastructure to allow us to easily work on these more complex projects. > > For the time I worked with it I found that we were able to successfully accomplish our projects but as our team and scope expanded, we ultimately out grew the abilities of Basecamp. ----- ### "Basecamp: Clarity and Communication Over Complexity" — 5.0/5 > **Radha** | *23. April 2026* | Rechtsberatung | Empfehlungsbewertung: 10.0/10 > > **Vorteile**: What I liked most about Basecamp was its simplicity and clarity. It’s designed to help teams stay organized without feeling overwhelmed. In particular: Clean, user‑friendly interface – Basecamp is easy to navigate, even for new users. Everything is laid out clearly, which reduces confusion and onboarding time. Focused approach to project management – Instead of endless features, Basecamp sticks to core tools like to‑do lists, message boards, schedules, and file sharing. This keeps teams focused on actual work. Strong communication structure – Centralized message boards and comment threads cut down on scattered emails and make it easier to follow conversations over time. Transparency and accountability – Everyone can see what’s happening, who’s responsible for what, and what’s coming next, which supports collaboration and ownership. Minimal setup and maintenance – Projects can be created and managed quickly without complex configuration or customization. Overall, the biggest strength of Basecamp is how it reduces noise and complexity, making it especially effective for teams that value clear communication and straightforward project tracking over heavy customization or advanced workflows. > > **Nachteile**: What I liked least about Basecamp was that its simplicity can also feel limiting, especially for more complex or fast‑moving teams. In particular: Limited advanced features – Basecamp intentionally avoids things like custom workflows, detailed task dependencies, or advanced reporting, which can make it feel restrictive for larger or more structured projects. Not ideal for complex project tracking – There’s no native support for things like Gantt charts, workload planning, or time tracking, which some teams rely on for visibility and deadlines. Flat structure can feel rigid – Since all projects follow the same basic setup, it’s harder to adapt Basecamp to different project types or processes. Fewer automation options – Compared to other project management tools, automation and integrations are relatively minimal, which can mean more manual follow‑up. Scaling challenges – As the number of projects and conversations grows, it can become harder to manage or surface priorities quickly. Overall, what I liked least wasn’t a flaw so much as a trade‑off: Basecamp prioritizes simplicity over flexibility. That works well for straightforward collaboration but can feel limiting for teams that need more structure, customization, or advanced tracking tools. > > My overall experience with Basecamp was positive and refreshing, especially for teams that value clarity, communication, and simplicity over complex project management frameworks. Basecamp excelled at keeping work organized and easy to follow. Its clean interface and straightforward structure made it easy for everyone on the team to understand where discussions were happening, what tasks were assigned, and what deadlines were coming up—without needing formal training or ongoing system management. Communication felt more intentional and less fragmented thanks to centralized message boards and discussion threads, which significantly reduced email back‑and‑forth. The platform encouraged a calmer, more focused way of working. By limiting features to the essentials, Basecamp helped prevent over‑planning and micromanagement. For smaller teams or projects with well‑defined goals, this approach supported collaboration and accountability without adding unnecessary overhead. However, the experience became less ideal as project complexity increased. The lack of advanced task dependencies, customization, reporting, or automation meant that more structured teams or deadline‑driven projects sometimes needed workarounds or supplementary tools. In those cases, Basecamp felt more suited to coordination and communication than detailed project tracking. Overall, I found Basecamp to be a strong collaboration tool that works best for teams seeking simplicity, transparency, and reduced noise. While it’s not built for highly complex project management, it delivers a smooth, user‑friendly experience that supports effective teamwork and clear communication. ----- Seite: 1 / 578\ Zurück: [Nächste Seite](https://www.capterra.at/software/56808/basecamp?page=2) ## Links - [Auf Capterra anzeigen](https://www.capterra.at/software/56808/basecamp) ## Diese Seite ist in den folgenden Sprachen verfügbar | Sprache | URL | | de | | | de-AT | | | de-CH | | | en | | | en-AE | | | en-AU | | | en-CA | | | en-GB | | | en-IE | | | en-IL | | | en-IN | | | en-NZ | | | en-SG | | | en-ZA | | | es | | | es-AR | | | es-CL | | | es-CO | | | es-CR | | | es-DO | | | es-EC | | | es-MX | | | es-PA | | | es-PE | | | fr | | | fr-BE | | | fr-CA | | | fr-LU | | | it | | | ja | | | nl | | | nl-BE | | | pl | | | pt | | | pt-PT | | | sv | | ----- ## Strukturierte Daten